From: <mi...@st...> - 2004-05-04 18:13:08
|
Ken Key wrote: > > I've attached the diff below to the change I was testing in > Modules/LDAPObject.c. Thanks a lot. > It is not a complete fix, as I still > need to go through the rest of the code to change the result() > return handling to deal with the 3 element tuple. > [..] > I'll work up a more complete patch in a couple of days. Don't worry. I'll work that out. > Honestly, > I half expected this idea to be rejected. Won't changing this > return value break any 3rd party code that uses ldap.result() > when they crack out the elements of the return tuple? I will probably preserve result() as is and provide a second method result2() or similar with class ldap.ldapobject.LDAPObject which returns the complete 3-tuple. Ciao, Michael. |