From: <mi...@st...> - 2004-03-10 19:57:58
|
Michael Str=F6der wrote: >=20 > I have a working solution without add_int_r() which might be=20 > backward-compatible if one strictly uses constants. This looks like a=20 > good compromise for me. I've committed this solution to CVS. Please test if your code using=20 python-ldap makes use of result types (e.g. see source of ldap.async). Ciao, Michael. |