From: Jens V. <je...@zo...> - 2002-12-24 15:27:03
|
michael, i know for a fact that the referral is not handled internally, the=20 entry on the master never gets changed. at this point i am not entirely=20= sure if my slave is indeed configured correctly. i did read in some unrelated documentation that how the referral is=20 handled differs based on the type of authentication you use. at this=20 moment i am using a simple bind. jens P.S.: frohe weihnachten ;) On Tuesday, Dec 24, 2002, at 10:11 US/Eastern, Michael Str=F6der wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> i have done some testing by setting up a master and slave and using=20= >> the "updateref" directive in the slave's slapd.conf. according to the=20= >> OpenLDAP documentation that should cause the slave to hand back the=20= >> URI designated in the updateref directive if someone attempts a >> = write. >> [..] >> conn.set_option(ldap.OPT_DEREF, ldap.DEREF_ALWAYS) > > This option is for setting alias dereferencing which is something=20 > different. > >> but this does not seem to make a change. > > Maybe the OpenLDAP lib handles the referral internally and already=20 > changes the entry on your master? > > If you don't want to let the OpenLDAP lib handle the referral you have=20= > to use: > > conn.set_option(ldap.OPT_REFERRALS,0) > > Ciao, Michael. > |