Re: delete_s() result

[Michael E. <men...@ka...>]

Very cool.  That's the way it should be!

maybe that little tidbit should be in the documentation somewhere?=20
although now it's archived in the mailing list... :-)

Mike
On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 12:07  PM, Michael Str=F6der wrote:

>
> Thanks to the early design decision of David you don't have to do=20
> error handling by checking result codes. If an error occurs during=20
> deletion of an entry an exception of class ldap.LDAPError or a derived=20=

> error class is raised.
>
> You can safely ignore results of add_s(), bind_s(), delete_s(),=20
> modify_s(), modrdn_s(), rename_s() and unbind_s().
>
> Ciao, Michael.