|
From: Jens V. <je...@zo...> - 2002-08-23 13:06:10
|
that looks good. now, all of these licenses mention that they are between the end user = and=20 some tangible entity, like the python software foundation in case of the=20= python license. what or who would that entity be for python-ldap? i have = a=20 feeling there must be some "licensor" explicitly named to make this = beast=20 enforceable at all. jens On Friday, August 23, 2002, at 08:54 , Michael Str=F6der wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >>> How about using this one: http://www.python.org/2.0.1/license.html >> which one? there's *3* separate licenses in there ;) > > (Sigh!) Well, how about > > PSF LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR PYTHON 2.2.1 > > from http://www.python.org/2.2.1/license.html? > > I really wonder what module authors mean by > writing "Python-style license". > > Ciao, Michael. > |