Re: FYI: ldaptor

[<mi...@st...>]

Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> 
> i was thinking of dropping support for python-ldap < 2.0 in new releases 
> of some of my python products. the problem that came to mind was that 
> people might be reluctant to switch to the latest python-ldap version 
> because the current release name, "2.0.0pre4", makes it sound like it's 
> not a finished release.

Indeed it's not finished yet. Hence "pre".

I would be willing to release a "2.0.0pre05" soon.

> here's my question: since we all have been using 2.0.0pre4 very 
> successfully (at least i have), would it be too much work to roll a 
> 2.0.0 release either from 2.0.0pre4 or a later CVS-state?

We did not use 2.0.0pre4 "very successfully". Remember the issues 
with performance fixed in current CVS? Remember open issues with 
libldap_r and thread-locking?

I don't yet have much feedback of tests done with current CVS 
version. I usually don't get much feedback if I ask questions like 
"any objections against removing xyz...".

Ciao, Michael.