Re: FYI: ldaptor

[Jens V. <je...@zo...>]

hi michael et al,

i was thinking of dropping support for python-ldap < 2.0 in new releases 
of some of my python products. the problem that came to mind was that 
people might be reluctant to switch to the latest python-ldap version 
because the current release name, "2.0.0pre4", makes it sound like it's 
not a finished release. i would be much more comfortable to tell people 
"get python-ldap 2.0.0" instead of "get python-ldap 2.0.0pre4".

here's my question: since we all have been using 2.0.0pre4 very 
successfully (at least i have), would it be too much work to roll a 2.0.0 
release either from 2.0.0pre4 or a later CVS-state?

jens