|
From: Jens V. <je...@zo...> - 2002-06-27 11:42:24
|
michael,
you're right, that was my mistake. i was transcribing the values from =
the=20
screen on a second machine, it was not done via copy/paste. here's a=20
current copy/paste result::
*** Read the RootDSE on same connection
100.785835 searches/second
*** Read the RootDSE on newly created connection without extra simple =
bind
95.549340 searches/second
*** Read the RootDSE on newly created connection with an extra simple =
bind
49.825837 searches/second
jens
On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 04:35 , Michael Str=F6der wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> - with leif's "fix":
>> *** Read the RootDSE on same connection
>> 82.275864 searches/second
>> *** Read the RootDSE on newly created connection without extra simple =
bind
>> 85.599961 searches/second
>> *** Read the RootDSE on newly created connection with an extra simple =
bind
>> 47.726886 searches/second
>
> Strange that you get more performance in the second case with a new=20
> connection established each time. Is that always the same when you =
repeat=20
> the test?
>
> Ciao, Michael.
>
|