|
From: <mci...@si...> - 2002-06-17 10:20:20
|
Michael Str=F6der =3Cmichael=40stroeder=2Ecom=3E writes=3A =3E Mauro Cicognini wrote=3A =3E =3E = =3E =3E However=2C I have seen that the searches don=27t show significant= = =3E =3E differences with the old 1=2Ex version=2E =3E = =3E Can you provide numbers=3F Hmmm=2C not really=2E It=27s just my feeling trying to do some simple = searches from the Python command line=3A I type the instruction=2C hit = return and =27=3E=3E=3E=27 comes up immediately (i=2Ee=2E no visibile del= ay)=2E I could do some timing=2C but I don=27t have the time now to set up the = environment now=2E=2E=2E sorry about this=2E I=27d be glad to supply sources and binaries to anyone interested=2C = though=2E =3E =3E The single call that takes a lot is the bind step=3A when I ask a= = =3E Python = =3E =3E script to bind it just seems to sit there and wait=2C more or les= s = =3E for 5 = =3E =3E seconds (strange coincidence)=2E =3E =3E = =3E =3E Could all this be related to the SASL libraries=3F =3E = =3E Hmm=2C no idea=2E I guess you are you talking about a simple bind=2E Yes=2C it=27s a simple bind=3A username and password=2E I guess it=27s also the only one supported by Win32 without certificates = or the whole Kerberos shebang=2E I really hope someone with SASL experience comes to our rescue=2E Mauro |