|
From: Joe L. <jl...@op...> - 2002-02-12 17:51:40
|
I'm using the same RawHide kernel (rebuilt) for my builds of python-ldap an= d the like. RedHat was experimenting with Ingo Molnar's new scheduler, and this is likely the suspect difference. There is a new patch he has just release, which I may apply against the kernel and rebuild. If you want the best performing 2.4.9 kernel, I'd go with 2.4.9-21 (RedHat 7.2 proper) BTW -- Hiya. At a new company? On 2/12/02 9:33 AM, "Leif Hedstrom" <le...@pr...> wrote: > Michael Str=F6der wrote: >=20 >> I've added measuring the time to the script itself and can't >> reproduce your results (tested with python2.0, python2.1.1 and >> python2.2). In my case redirecting stdout to /dev/null was faster. >> How did you do time measuring? Maybe somebody screwed up /dev/null >> on your system? >>=20 >=20 > Well, the good news is that I've solved my problem, and it's not related > to Python LDAP at all. :-). >=20 > I wrote a small C-program that also reproduced the same problem. So, > this narrowed it down to a few things: C-compiler, glibc or kernel. I > hadn't touched the first two in quite a while, but I did upgrade the > kernel a week ago... So, I rolled back to 2.4.7 (from 2.4.17), and now > my problem is gone. Don't ask me what happend with the 2.4.17 kernel, I > hadn't noticed any problems or errors at all after the upgrade (RPM from > Rawhide), but something is not good... >=20 > The module still leaks memory though, I'll poke at that little later. > Thanks again for the help, so I could narrow things down to the real > problem. :-) >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > -- Leif >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Python-LDAP-dev mailing list > Pyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-ldap-dev |