Re: compilation error

[Michael <mi...@st...>]

David Leonard wrote:
> 
> mmmm, release... everyone is eager to do an interim release.
> I think 1.10 could be "released" by just renaming 1.10a3 to 1.10 :)

No! That's not right. Review the CVS logs!

There were patches after 1.10a3 adressing proper handling of (error)
results of ldap_result (also by Konstantin) which slightly changes
the result returned by LDAPObject.result() method in case of no
result received. (Uuuh, did anybody of you understand this sentence?
;-)

AFAIK also another memory leak was fixed (if you didn't loose the
patch... ;-).

> 1.11 can also appear soon. it just needs a little more removing of
> non-openldapisms testing and then packaging.

No! Just leave it as it is. Please, please...

Call it 1.11 to avoid confusion because *it is* significantly
different from 1.10a3. But it's stable.

Ciao, Michael.