From: Michael <mi...@st...> - 2000-12-11 13:32:53
|
David Leonard wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Michael Ströder typed thusly: > > I think we should leave the 1.x stuff as is and start with > > python-ldap-ext based on OpenLDAP 2.0.x... > > Okay, to keep everyone on the list informed: > > Michael, as a knowledgable Karlsruhe local, showed me all the local > restaurants that have closed down and then we discussed the direction for > python-ldap. After a few drinks, and a discussion on cats, we agreed on > the following plan: Been there, got a t-shirt(?). > In addition, I seek more comment on any more changes that the _ldap library > may need to support LDAPv3 connections. (Remember that the purpose of this > module is not to give an abstraction of X.500 directory services, but rather > to provide an abstraction of the LDAP C API.) I would like to stay as close as possible to the new LDAP-EXT API in OpenLDAP 2.0.x since this API already trys to give some level of abstraction (SASL for providing several authentication methods etc.). Once again the things I would like to see: - LDAPv3 binding - proper support for search continuations (LDAPv3 referrals) - SSL and STARTTLS support - Access to schema functions (would save lots of work in Python applications) - Virtual List Controls (rather low-prio) IMHO python-ldap 2.0 should provide as much access to the C-API as possible (except the functions marked as deprecated in ldap.h. We can put a Python-written abstraction layer above this later. > Please, comment! Yes! I hope this discussion is not "local". ;-) Ciao, Michael. |