Re: 1.10alpha 'release'

[Michael <mi...@st...>]

Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> 
> IMHO _ldapmodule.so + ldap.py is more flexible because it makes
> it easier to add stuff to "the ldap module" in python.
> ldapmodule.so requires enhancements to be implemented in C.

But different versions of ldap.py will be necessary when
distributing C ldap-module and ldaplib separately. It's ok if we
rename Fog's stuff to ldaplib and keep ldap.py (small wrapper
module) and _ldapmodule.so.

And due to start-up latency when doing "import ldap" with lots of
stuff imported I want to keep both separated.

But what about the problem that _ldap.__version__ is not correctly
imported by the wrapper module ldap.py with "from _ldap import *"?

Ciao, Michael.