Re: Roadmap for ldapmodule

[Michael <mi...@st...>]

Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> 
> > > > 6. Distributing with Python's standard lib (low priority):
> > >
> > > i don't agree on that.
> >
> > Any good reason why?
> 
> not really. but maintaining a package inside a bigger one, that works
> on multiple platforms not widely available to the software author is
> not an easy task. but that's David's problem, right?

But triggering all package maintainers is not an easy task either.
It's not even an easy task to know them all.

Ciao, Michael.