From: Chris D. <pak...@gm...> - 2009-11-11 15:24:32
|
I have to work with IBM Directory Server on a regular basis, and that includes some nasty schema analysis for moving some history local schema modifications to new versions of the product. I was able to use ldap.schema to simplify most of the nastiness. However, IBM extends the schema with the additional attribute IBMAttributetypes, which describes chracteristics of how attributes will be stored in the backend. IBM was polite enough to document the grammar for this new attribute and I'll be attempting to create an IBMAttributetype class to hold these. Now, should I just add the new class to ldap.schema.models and submit a patch once done? Or should a long term approach of being able to indicate the addition of server specific extensions be contemplated? Thanks, Chris Dukes |