python-gtkextra-devel Mailing List for GtkExtra Python Language Bindings (Page 2)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
treeves
Menu
▾
▴
python-gtkextra-devel — Discussion of development topics.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Adrian F. <fe...@ma...> - 2002-01-23 00:23:42
|
I didn't know of any commercial program using the python bindings. which one, for instance? I'm just curious. On the other hand, the Applix people have been very cooperative, and contributed with lots of fixes and improvements for gtksheet. I can't complain, and I'm thankful for that. Anyway, I thought that making the gtkextra LPGL would be good. In any case, the licence is clear, and they should contribute with their changes and make them public. And they don't have the right to whine, cry, or complain, we are making it for free in our spare time ;-) Donations are welcome, though :-) Saludosm, <ADRIAN> On 21 Jan 2002, Andreas Voegele wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mathew Yeates writes: > > > Are there any plans to complete this? It appears to me that > > python-gtkextra-0.21 only works with earlier versions of gtkextra. > > The CVS version works with GtkExtra 0.99.17 although the support for > the new GtkPlotDT widget is still missing. I won't be able to release > a version before the end of February. > > > This should be made clear somewhere on the python-gtkextra homepage > > but isnt. > > I don't have the time to update the main page but it's on the download > page and in the ChangeLog. > > > There hasnt been a CVS commit for python-gtkextra since Jan 4. Maybe > > gtkextra shouldnt advertise having python wrappings until some > > progress is made. > > It really bothers me that several people use the bindings in > *proprietary* programs but aren't willing to work on the bindings and > complain about the progress. Or are you going to use the bindings in > a free program? > > I think that it was really a mistake to release the bindings under the > LGPL instead of the GPL. > > - -- > Bye, > Andreas > > "Military intelligence is a contradiction in terms." (Groucho Marx) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/> > > iEYEARECAAYFAjxMeucACgkQPv9zsxLCHcoQ/wCfdHGxAgm/kTVUJOJaU25Fe+VK > FBoAn2WG3wptslh+fBDR8jL6VxHx+N4g > =+5nH > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Scigraphica-gtkextra mailing list > Sci...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scigraphica-gtkextra > |
|
From: Mathew Y. <ma...@fu...> - 2002-01-21 20:56:05
|
> > It really bothers me that several people use the bindings in > *proprietary* programs but aren't willing to work on the bindings and > complain about the progress. Or are you going to use the bindings in > a free program? > Well, it isnt a commercial program. I tried looking at the bindings but I don't have much experience with the current method of generating bindings. In the past, I seem to recall the pygtk bindings were generated with swig. I'll take a look again and see if I can figure it out Mathew |
|
From: Andreas V. <voe...@us...> - 2002-01-21 20:33:50
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mathew Yeates writes: > Are there any plans to complete this? It appears to me that > python-gtkextra-0.21 only works with earlier versions of gtkextra. The CVS version works with GtkExtra 0.99.17 although the support for the new GtkPlotDT widget is still missing. I won't be able to release a version before the end of February. > This should be made clear somewhere on the python-gtkextra homepage > but isnt. I don't have the time to update the main page but it's on the download page and in the ChangeLog. > There hasnt been a CVS commit for python-gtkextra since Jan 4. Maybe > gtkextra shouldnt advertise having python wrappings until some > progress is made. It really bothers me that several people use the bindings in *proprietary* programs but aren't willing to work on the bindings and complain about the progress. Or are you going to use the bindings in a free program? I think that it was really a mistake to release the bindings under the LGPL instead of the GPL. - -- Bye, Andreas "Military intelligence is a contradiction in terms." (Groucho Marx) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/> iEYEARECAAYFAjxMeucACgkQPv9zsxLCHcoQ/wCfdHGxAgm/kTVUJOJaU25Fe+VK FBoAn2WG3wptslh+fBDR8jL6VxHx+N4g =+5nH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Mathew Y. <ma...@fu...> - 2002-01-21 19:35:28
|
Are there any plans to complete this? It appears to me that python-gtkextra-0.21 only works with earlier versions of gtkextra. This should be made clear somewhere on the python-gtkextra homepage but isnt. There hasnt been a CVS commit for python-gtkextra since Jan 4. Maybe gtkextra shouldnt advertise having python wrappings until some progress is made. Mathew |
|
From: Toby D. R. <to...@so...> - 2002-01-12 15:38:36
|
Hi, First, Andreas has done a great job with the bindings thus far. We now depend on them in a fairly large (75K lines) tool. He had in the past stated he wanted someone to help with them. I volunteered to help port to PyGtk2 when the GtkExtra moves there. We only use the Plotting widgets. I still plan on doing this. I have been very busy with little spare time and have not been following the latest developments in GtkExtra or PyGtk2 much. Andreas clearly has the best current knowledge of whats going on and what needs to change to support PyGtk2 if/when GtkExtra goes 2.0. If someone else could contribute, that would be EXCELLENT. We are commented to the Gtk/Python/PyGtk/GtkExtra/PyGtkExtra mix. It has been very productive for us. "We" means the company I work for and the government agency we contract with. I've not yet subscribed to the GtkExtra list, I think I will now. Toby Quoting Peter Kese <pet...@ij...>: > > Thanks for reply! > > I have posted that question because I am in a middle of a project > where I could use some GtkExtra things, like notebooks and plots. > > I guess that for the moment I won't have enough time to dig into > GtkExtra and Gtk 2.0 things so I may write some custom widgets > or just port a small part of GtkExtra to Gtk 2.0. > > Thanks anyway and I hope you will enjoy GNUstep. I will stick > to Python/Gtk as I find them very useful and like them more and > more. > > Cheers, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Python-gtkextra-devel mailing list > Pyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-gtkextra-devel > |
|
From: Peter K. <pet...@ij...> - 2002-01-12 11:16:39
|
Thanks for reply! I have posted that question because I am in a middle of a project where I could use some GtkExtra things, like notebooks and plots. I guess that for the moment I won't have enough time to dig into GtkExtra and Gtk 2.0 things so I may write some custom widgets or just port a small part of GtkExtra to Gtk 2.0. Thanks anyway and I hope you will enjoy GNUstep. I will stick to Python/Gtk as I find them very useful and like them more and more. Cheers, Peter |
|
From: Peter K. <pet...@ij...> - 2002-01-12 11:10:50
|
Peter Kese wrote: > When browsing through the Online CVS archieve of your pygtk-extra, I > have seen some references (namely in ChangeLog) to PyGtk 1.99.6. > Does this mean that pygtk-extra also in some form works with > python2.2 / Gtk 2.0 / PyGtk 1.99.6 ? The Python bindings for GtkExtra use the new defs file format proposed for Gtk 2.0. Thus there are some references to PyGtk 1.99.6 in the ChangeLog. The gtkextra.defs file is converted into the old format before the C code for the bindings is generated though. > Anyway the real question is what is the status of > gtkextra/pygtk-extra and gtk 2.0? Can it be used with gtk 2.0? No, the bindings cannot be used with Gtk 2.0 since the GtkExtra library hasn't been ported to Gtk 2.0 yet. > How difficult / How much work? Since the Python bindings already use the new defs file format it should be easy to port the bindings to Gtk 2.0. But there are some problems with the GtkExtra library: - Currently the bindings support several signals that use GTK_TYPE_POINTER. The version for Gtk 2.0 won't support these signals. When I looked at the signal code in PyGtk 1.99.x some months ago it seemed to be impossible to support signals that use GTK_TYPE_POINTER. Gtk widgets shouldn't use GTK_TYPE_POINTER anyway. If the GtkExtra library isn't changed Python users won't be able to use the following signals in the future: GtkSheet - traverse GtkPlot - moved, resized, tick_label - Currently the GtkExtra library doesn't register the enumerations and flags that are defined in the library's header files as Gtk types. AFAIK enumerations, flags as well as other types must be registered properly when Gtk 2.0 and PyGtk 1.99.x are used. - If types like GtkIconListItem were subclasses of GObject it would be easier to write bindings for GtkExtra. BTW, I'm not very interested in Python and Gtk anymore. Python 1.5 is really great but I don't like most of the recent additions to the Python language. I'm also planning to switch to GNUstep and thus won't use Gtk anymore. I will maintain the Python bindings if nobody else takes them. But I'm not going to help porting GtkExtra to Gtk 2.0. If the issues mentioned above aren't resolved than the Python bindings won't support these features in the future. But you can help to port GtkExtra to Gtk 2.0 and make sure that the GtkExtra widgets work like the standard Gtk 2.0 widgets and that it will be easy to write bindings for GtkExtra. -- Bye, Andreas |
|
From: Toby D. R. <to...@so...> - 2002-01-04 00:07:38
|
Hi, Before you cut a new release, I've got a few minor bug fixes to check in. I'll do that tommorrow, Friday EST. ------------------------------------------ Toby D. Reeves Solid State Scientific Corporation Email: to...@so... Phone: (603) 493-4759 Fax: (603) 594-4095 ------------------------------------------ Quoting Andreas Voegele <voe...@us...>: > Hi, > > I've committed some changes to the CVS. The bindings now require > GtkExtra-0.99.17. The bindings for the new GtkPlotDT widget are still > missing though. I am going to add these bindings and example programs > for GtkPlotDT and the plot iterator at the weekend. > > The API hasn't changed much. GtkPlotData.set_gradient() and > get_gradient() now get/return the number of sublevels as an additional > parameter. The number of sublevels defaults to 0. > > -- > Bye, > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > Python-gtkextra-devel mailing list > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-gtkextra-devel > |
|
From: Chen s. <che...@ya...> - 2001-11-26 02:40:46
|
Hi,
I create a GtkWindow and add a GtkPlotCanvas to it,
then I destroy the
window. I expect the memory of GtkPlotCanvas should be
released
automatically, but it is not the case.
I don't know whether this is a bug or not.
while(1):
win = GtkWindow()
win.add(GtkPlotCanvas(500, 500))
win.destroy()
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
|
1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
