From: Norbert N. <Nor...@gm...> - 2004-09-30 16:44:42
|
Sounds like a fundamental flaw in the design of HDF5 - a high-end data-storage system like HDF5 without protection against file corruption sounds unbelievable to me. The argument that this is the same for any kind of file-storage does not hold here: I you use a journalled filesystem, you know that basic write operations are atomic. Based on that, it is possible with some care to design a file-format and protocol of writing that leaves the file in a well-defined state at any moment. If, in HDF5, the basic operations are not atomic in the same sense, it will never be possible to build a secure system on top of it. Writing additional copies of the file every now and then is, of course, a solution, but it really destroys all the benefits from the high-performance file format HDF5... On Thursday 30 September 2004 17:02, Francesc Alted wrote: > Someone at the list of HDF5 has answered. It looks like the danger of > corruption is real. Matt suggest writing a number of dumps to avoid the > worst to happen. > > Cheers, -- _________________________________________Norbert Nemec Altdorfer Str. 9a ... D-93049 Regensburg Tel: 0941 / 2009638 ... Mobile: 0179 / 7475199 eMail: <No...@Ne...> |