|
From: Norbert N. <Nor...@gm...> - 2004-09-30 16:44:42
|
Sounds like a fundamental flaw in the design of HDF5 - a high-end data-storage
system like HDF5 without protection against file corruption sounds
unbelievable to me.
The argument that this is the same for any kind of file-storage does not hold
here: I you use a journalled filesystem, you know that basic write operations
are atomic. Based on that, it is possible with some care to design a
file-format and protocol of writing that leaves the file in a well-defined
state at any moment.
If, in HDF5, the basic operations are not atomic in the same sense, it will
never be possible to build a secure system on top of it.
Writing additional copies of the file every now and then is, of course, a
solution, but it really destroys all the benefits from the high-performance
file format HDF5...
On Thursday 30 September 2004 17:02, Francesc Alted wrote:
> Someone at the list of HDF5 has answered. It looks like the danger of
> corruption is real. Matt suggest writing a number of dumps to avoid the
> worst to happen.
>
> Cheers,
--
_________________________________________Norbert Nemec
Altdorfer Str. 9a ... D-93049 Regensburg
Tel: 0941 / 2009638 ... Mobile: 0179 / 7475199
eMail: <No...@Ne...>
|