From: Antonio V. <ant...@ti...> - 2013-04-26 06:46:30
|
Hi Francesc, Il 25/04/2013 23:06, Francesc Alted ha scritto: > Thanks. Will do! Thanks. For the record patches 0002 and 0003 close issue [75] and [77]. Also numexpr 2.1 closes [91] and [95] [75] https://code.google.com/p/numexpr/issues/detail?id=75 [77] https://code.google.com/p/numexpr/issues/detail?id=77 [91] https://code.google.com/p/numexpr/issues/detail?id=91 [95] https://code.google.com/p/numexpr/issues/detail?id=95 > El 25/04/2013 21:02, "Antonio Valentino" <ant...@ti...> va > escriure: > >> Hi Francesc, >> >> Il 14/04/2013 22:19, Francesc Alted ha scritto: >>> ============================ >>> Announcing Numexpr 2.1RC1 >>> ============================ >>> [CUT] >> >> probably it is a little bit late now but it would be nice if you could >> consider to include the patches (patch 0002 and 0003) used in debian [1]. >> >> Patch 0001 can probably be avoided by adding setup.cfg to the >> MANIFEST.in file. >> >> >> thanks in advance >> >> [1] >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/numexpr.git;a=tree;f=debian/patches;h=73937039da00e4ecbd9318a856be4aa39325e55f;hb=HEAD >> >> -- >> Antonio Valentino >> -- Antonio Valentino |