From: Francesc A. <fa...@py...> - 2012-07-12 08:36:37
|
On 7/11/12 7:06 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: > >> BTW, which is the status of the 3.x support? I vaguely remember >> you asking me for some help on this, but I don't remember well. Not >> that I have a lot of time to spend on it, but perhaps I can use >> some hours in the next days. > well, in PyTables 2.4 we made some job in preparation of the porting > to python3, but the porting itself is still not started. > > One of the main issues is that numexpr still not supports python3 so > we have a missing dependency. > > I started a porting of numexpr to python3 (see [1]) but it is still > incomplete. > I hope it is good enough to let us start working on the porting of > PyTables. > > Of course if you would like to give a look to numexpr for python3 it > would be of great help. Ah yes. I have also tried with the porting of numexpr to python3, but failed. I'll try to have a look at your patches and see if we can make it. Not sure when I'll have time to tackle this, but hopefully I'll be able to tell you something soon. > > After the PyTables 2.4 final I plan to publish a wiki page with my > roadmap proposal. IMHO main points are: > > * open a new branch in the repo > * remove al deprecated code (Numeric, numarray, netcdf3, etc). This > breaks the API and, IMHO, we will also need to bump the format version > * ensure that all the required SW work (enough) on python3 > * handle str/unicode issues > * full support to unicode HDF5 object names > * start working an a good setup for 2to3 (needs some investigation) > * ... > > Please let me know if you think there are other point that are > important for python3 support Ok. That looks good. This is a lot of work though, but I hope you will manage. Thanks for the fine work! -- Francesc Alted |