Re: [Pyre2-devel] will submit a PEP soon

[Pierre B. de R. <pie...@ci...>]

Ok, I just read your document (sorry for the delay but I couldn't do it 
before).

First, you should make it clear in your PEP that the different points 
may be discussed separatly (ie. the functions thing and the tree thing). 
I even wonder if that shouldn't be 2 PEPs ...

Otherwise, your document is clear. But it lacks the implementation part. 
I think you should differ the details this part until you proposed it to 
the main python-dev list. But do not forget to mention that you 
implemented it in a python module ! Implementation is very important !

The only point I disagree is about backward compatibility. What you 
propose does NOT break any existing code (you took great care about 
that). And you should note it clearly. From what you wrote, one could 
infer just the opposite.

At last, do not forget to send a message to python-dev and follow 
closely what happens there ;)

Pierre

-- 
Pierre Barbier de Reuille

INRA - UMR Cirad/Inra/Cnrs/Univ.MontpellierII AMAP
Botanique et Bio-informatique de l'Architecture des Plantes
TA40/PSII, Boulevard de la Lironde
34398 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5, France

tel   : (33) 4 67 61 65 77    fax   : (33) 4 67 61 56 68