From: Phil T. <ph...@ri...> - 2006-01-17 09:54:49
|
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 9:38 am, Michael Mondragon wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using PyQt and Qt3&4, along with the Eric3 IDE, on > Linux and BSD. Nice stuff. > > Trying to get the same environment on OS X, though, is > painful. Ridiculously so. I'll gloss over the problems with > Eric3 [python 2.3 not 2.4, and refuses to save preferences/ > settings]. > > I've been trying to build Qt4 and PyQt for use on OS X > using the Framework structure that is more or less > native to OS X. Both Qt4 and PyQt build to the framework > structure, so this should be no problem... > > Problem. PyQt expects Qt4 to be in anything *but* framework > format. I tried symlinking everything [all of the frameworks > under my QTDIR into /Library/Frameworks, then all of the > headers and librarys into QTDIR/include and QTDIR/lib], only > to have the build fail claiming that QtCore was not a shared > library [probably symlinked the wrong thing, but file(1) thought > it was a shared library]. > > Currently compiling Qt4 *again*, with -no-framework, to make > PyQt build. > > Is it possible for future [non-developer] releases of PyQt to > have a config parameter for linking to OS X framework builds? > Seems odd to have both components build frameworks, but > not be able to link together. Some points that may help clarify things... 1. Minimal work has been done on PyQt4 for OS X, because... 2. I don't have a Mac. 3. All work to get PyQt3 working on OS X was done by Mac users and sending me patches. Phil |