From: Sean R. <ja...@tu...> - 2003-02-03 07:48:28
|
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 11:49:48PM -0500, Billy G. Allie wrote: >I created the table above and ran the given python code for 60 CPU minutes. >I did not experience any memory growth. My memory started out at 5.3MB and >stayed there. Note: the table was empty for this test. Yeah, the table on my end is empty as well. I mean, I'm able to reproduce it with an empty table... >Does the sample code cause memory growth on all your machines? I've only run it on two machines. Let me try another machine real quick... I've just tried it on another 7.3 machine and and 8.0 machine, all similar specs to what I mentioned before, but not machines I had tested before. They are both exhibiting memory leaks. Over 1.5 CPU minutes I see about 15MB of growth (20MB total), with empty tables. >I will inspect the code to see if anything obvious stands out. Given the >simplicity of the sample code, it would seem that the leak may be related to >the libpq result object. That's kind of what I'm thinking as well. Sean -- Hi, my name's Sean, but my friends call me... Actually, my friends USUALLY e-mail me... -- Sean Reifschneider, 2000 Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <ja...@tu...> tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, Python, SysAdmin |