Re: [Pyparsing] Newline-Sensitive Languages
Brought to you by:
ptmcg
From: Eric D. <eri...@gm...> - 2017-07-11 12:07:17
|
That looks like it should work! I tried something like that earlier but couldn't quite get it working right, but I think it had to do with namespace issues more than anything. On 11 Jul 2017 12:43 am, "Evan Hubinger" <eva...@gm...> wrote: > How about this: > > from pyparsing import ParserElement, Literal > ParserElement.setDefaultWhitespaceChars(" \t\r\f\v") > newline = Literal("\n") > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Eric Dilmore <eri...@gm...> > wrote: > >> What is the best way to create a newline-sensitive language (like Python >> itself)? I continually run into problems where the newlines are eaten by >> the automated whitespace-grabber, and I've found what I believe to be two >> working solutions: >> >> - Attach .setWhitespaceChars(' \t') to the end of all of the low-level >> parsers so that, when combined, they don't gobble up newlines. >> - Add White(' \t') between all low-level parsers, such that they eat >> non-newline whitespace but not the newlines. >> >> Neither one of these is particularly elegant. It would be nice if >> .setWhitespaceChars propagated down to children (like .ignore does), but I >> don't expect it to be changed anytime soon because it would break backwards >> compatibility pretty bad for anyone who was using either one of these >> methods of producing newline-dependent languages. >> >> Which of these two is preferable? Or, alternatively, is there an even >> better way that I haven't thought of yet? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Pyparsing-users mailing list >> Pyp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyparsing-users >> > > > > -- > “The true logic of this world is in the calculus of probabilities.” – > James Clerk Maxwell > |