Re: [pyOpenSSL] CRL patch

[Arnaud D. <arn...@fr...>]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:55:19PM +0000, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Dec 28 21:26:03 2006, Arnaud Desmons wrote:
> >Maybe I will do a separate sign(cacert, cakey) fonction instead of
> >doing everything in dump_crl???
> 
> I get quite a few failed hunks on this, applying to my tree - I'll 
> take a look at this in more detail later, but would you like to have 
> a look?

[...]

> It might have some CRL capability already - I've not examined what 
> the pyopenssl-extended patches do, yet. So far, where there's been 
> clashes between that and your code, I've preferred yours, but you 
> might not want to reimplement everything. :-)

Right, I'm not really interested in merging my code with
pyopenssl-extended as far as I don't need pyopenssl-extended... :-)

Anyway, I am not sure that users need both fonctionnalities at the
same time...

-- 
Arnaud