Re: [PyOpenGL-Users] OPENGL

[Greg E. <gre...@ca...>]

horace wrote:
> so if i understand this correctly, pyopengl consist of an auto-generated 
> "raw" opengl layer and another layer on top of it which makes it more 
> "pythonic"? and the auto-generated ctypes "raw" layer could in theory be 
> replaced with an auto-generated pyrex "raw" layer?

If the ctypes layer is already being auto-generated, there
shouldn't be any technical obstacle to generating Pyrex
definitions instead, I would think.

--
Greg