From: Sean G. <sgi...@fr...> - 2003-10-06 21:23:52
|
I'm open to whatever release strategy works well with minimum fuss, so that I can spend time bringing the WMSClient up to the same level of completeness as WFSClient. Sean On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Jea...@cc... wrote: > Sean, > > OK, I've thrown in our first news item! > > As for the future, sure, I have no problem doing some of them. > > As for the script or list of files to include in a release, a good > idea, > just one concern: This assumes that we want to tag the latest version > ? What > if it's not the case? Maybe we should track the version of the file we > want > tagged also ? > > Have a file that lists the files/dirs we want released for that > specific > release. For example a file called "release-files-0_2_0.txt" that > contains: > > README.txt 1.3 > LICENCE.txt 1.4 > ogclib/__init__.py 1.3 > > etc ... ? > > A separate sed/awk/perl script can process them upon each release. > > Thoughts ? > J.F. > |