From: <Jea...@CC...> - 2003-10-04 19:59:01
|
Although for entirely different reasons, I agree with Sean, and am happy with the choice we've made license-wise. J.F. -----Original Message----- From: Sean Gillies To: Jan-Oliver Wagner Cc: pyo...@li... Sent: 04/10/2003 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [Pyogclib-developers] Releasing pyogclib On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 09:37 AM, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:29:55AM -0600, Sean Gillies wrote: >> The WMSClient module is ready to go. Jan has said that he's already >> used it, and I'd like to release new versions of other software that >> would use the library. > > I'd appreciate an early release. > > BTW: Have you finally settled your mind regarding the license? > > Best > > Jan > Jan, sorry I overlooked this email! We'll stick with the current license. I'm sympathetic to the GPL and LGPL and it suits my _personal_ politics. I consider myself to be at least two standard deviations to the left of the US political center -- making me only marginally left in Europe, eh? :) However, I am stuck working in the US, and my clients are (presently) US companies. For the software that I am going to use in business, I think a less political license is best. I hope this choice won't prevent other developers from joining us. The Python programmer that J.F. and I are most interested on getting on board to start is Frank Warmerdam, and he seems to be pretty satisfied with the MIT-style license. cheers, Sean ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Pyogclib-developers mailing list Pyo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyogclib-developers |