Re: [Pyogclib-developers] Releasing pyogclib

[Sean G. <sgi...@fr...>]

Monday sounds good to me.  I'll move the web page and over the weekend 
will
make a build script that will run epydoc and convert future DocBook 
docs to
HTML.

Since sourceforge hasn't epydoc, how about if I make the release 
tarball on
my machine and then upload it to the sourceforge site?  I've got the 
tools
to process DocBook as well, using the Ft.Xml.Xlst module from 4thought.

Sean

On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 09:41  AM, 
Jea...@cc... wrote:

> Sean,
>
> Agreed, we should release something, and 0.1 sounds like a good place 
> to
> start :) !
>
> I've started adding a variety of doc strings in my code, just haven't
> commited any of it yet, once that's done, I'll be ok with a first 
> release.
>
> Hopefully that will happen before the end of the week.
>
> I'm already on a feature freeze for WFSClient anyways ... And I agree 
> that
> for now the API docs should be ok.  We should just adjust the website 
> so
> that it work as expected (i.e. the home page is indeed the home page,
> instead of under foo/ ).
>
> How does next monday sound for a release ? that way if I can't find 
> time to
> do it at work I'll have the week-end to catch up.
>
> J.F.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Gillies [mailto:sgi...@fr...]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: pyo...@li...
> Subject: [Pyogclib-developers] Releasing pyogclib
>
>
> Let's make a first release of the library.
>
> The WMSClient module is ready to go.  Jan has said that he's already
> used it, and I'd like to release new versions of other software that
> would use the library.
>
> The WMSServer module remains in a state that is really only useful
> with MapServer, but I think that we shouldn't let this hold up a
> release.  If we call this 0.1, I think I'd rather wait till 0.2 to
> have a more generally useful WMSServer.  My plan for that is to have
> a small set of classes that would allow a WMS Server to be easily
> constructed from something as basic as Python's cgi library + GDAL.
> This will take some time.
>
> J.F., I know that you wanted to write some user docs before a first
> release, but how about for now we focus on documentation in the code
> and keep the user docs very simple?  I have picked up the DocBook
> distribution.  Since you're using 4.1.2 with MapServer, would you
> prefer to stay with that?  Any reason to go to 4.2?
>
> Can we set a date for a code freeze and then a date for release?
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Pyogclib-developers mailing list
> Pyo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyogclib-developers
>