RE: [Pyogclib-developers] Re: The web site

[<Jea...@CC...>]

Sean,

Actually I'm getting posts to the list, and mine seem to be making it out,
I'm just not getting my own posts back.

Keeping my comments in mind, I am OK with the site as it is right now, and
for now ... I think it's important for us to get a decent web presence
started, but not spend too much time on it, since the focus should still be
on code until we get a first release out.

Sure thing, I'll add the intro part of the readme to the __init__ ... And at
some point I'll let you know when I'm done updating my code with docstrings
.. I'll be using what's up right now as a reference to figure out where I
should write up something better ...

J.F.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Gillies [mailto:sgi...@fr...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Jea...@cc...
Cc: pyo...@li...
Subject: [Pyogclib-developers] Re: The web site


J.F.,

I am cc'ing this to the pyogclib-developers list since it seems that you
are still stuck in mailman limbo.

All your points are right on.  I don't want to spend any more time than
necessary on the site and would like to use RSS and the sourceforge
project news as much as we can.

Docstrings ... while you are at it, will you put the readme in as a
docstring in ogclib.__init__.py so we can have a package-level
description appear in the epydoc docs?

You're OK with the basic layout and content?

Sean

Aside: I ran epydoc against the Python Mapscript module and it is not
as useful as I'd hope.  None of the method arguments are named, which
I should have expected.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Pyogclib-developers mailing list
Pyo...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyogclib-developers