From: Sean G. <sgi...@fr...> - 2003-09-23 21:15:46
|
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 11:08 AM, Jea...@CC... wrote: > Jan, > > Indeed! I had forgotten about those guys, though I'd heard about them > before > .... > > It would be good to study their implementations and class structures > and so > on, as we probably could learn a lot from it all, no sense > re-inventing the > wheel. I see there's a JavaDoc interface for example that we could > take a > look at. I'd be interested in seeing how they handle certain WFS > issues, > such as Schema generation ... > > Personally, I'm more interested in clients for Python than servers > right > now, as that's where my need lies. So I'd like to further push the WFS > Client to be as flexible as possible, it's kind of restricted in it's > support of Schema parsing right now ... I have some funky ideas I'll > post > soon as far as that goes ... I notice Deegree has released a WMS client > implementation though ! I wonder if they're going to do a WFS one ?? :) > > If we were to write pure OGC Python servers, I'd be really tempted to > look > at the Twisted framework however ... any of you have experience with > it ? > > J.F. > I like Twisted! PyOGCLib + MapScript + Twisted would make a great WMS server, as Twisted doesn't require thread-safety of mapscript. Twisted is also quite symmetric, and is good for creating clients as well. I don't think we should write a server that is distributed with PyOGCLib. Sean |