Re: [Pyode-user] about ode 0.7

[Jacob E. <jac...@gm...>]

I think I successfully built against ode0.7.  But it's been a while,
so I don't quite remember what I did to do it.  Look over the email
archives, and I think you should find some information from my posts.

Jacob Everist

On 1/8/07, Ethan Glasser-Camp <gl...@cs...> wrote:
> Matthias Baas wrote:
> > That shouldn't be a problem as the old names are still around. But the
> > build process might fail for other reasons (user-settings missing, etc.)
> > so I'd also recommend using the current CVS version which is meant to be
> > used with ODE 0.7.
>
> I think pyode built against ODE 0.5 will link against the CCylinder
> symbol, which is absent in 0.7. But I see ODE has #defines that change
> CCylinder calls to Capsule calls, so building 1.1.0 against 0.7
> shouldn't be a problem (at least not because of names changing).
>
> Is a new release of pyode expected any time soon? Is there anything
> holding it back from being released? Failing that, are there any plans
> to make Windows builds of Pyode CVS? I'm trying to compile it myself
> but it's a huge pain.
>
> Ethan
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pyode-user mailing list
> Pyo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyode-user
>
>
>
>


-- 

Jacob Everist