Re: [Pyode-user] about ode 0.7

[Ethan Glasser-C. <gl...@cs...>]

Matthias Baas wrote:
> That shouldn't be a problem as the old names are still around. But the =

> build process might fail for other reasons (user-settings missing, etc.=
)=20
> so I'd also recommend using the current CVS version which is meant to b=
e=20
> used with ODE 0.7.

I think pyode built against ODE 0.5 will link against the CCylinder
symbol, which is absent in 0.7. But I see ODE has #defines that change
CCylinder calls to Capsule calls, so building 1.1.0 against 0.7
shouldn't be a problem (at least not because of names changing).

Is a new release of pyode expected any time soon? Is there anything
holding it back from being released? Failing that, are there any plans
to make Windows builds of Pyode CVS? I'm trying to compile it myself
but it's a huge pain.

Ethan