Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Default to returning (void)?

[Ronald O. <ous...@ci...>]

On 16-feb-04, at 17:03, b.bum wrote:

> On Feb 16, 2004, at 7:50 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> On 16-feb-04, at 16:15, Marc-Antoine Parent wrote:
>>> Le 04-02-16, =E0 00:00, b.bum a =E9crit :
>> I'm all for adding easy to use names instead of using selector()=20
>> directly, we'll have to do that anyway if we want to use syntactic=20
>> sugar later on.
>>
>> CVS will soon contain the functions that Bob proposed.
>
> For once, I may have managed to beat Ronald to this.  Let's hope I got=20=

> it right.

You did manage to beat me. There's one thing I don't like about your=20
change: the function name, I prefer an initial lowercase letter. That=20
also reads nicer with the proposed syntax changes for properties:

	def objc.accessor setFoo(self, newFoo):
=09
or
	def setFoo(self, newFoo) [objc.accessor]:


I'm not yet 100% sure if I like a single function instead of a pair of=20=

functions.

Ronald

--
X|support bv            http://www.xsupport.nl/
T:  +31 610271479       F:  +31 204416173