Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Default to returning (void)?

[b.bum <bb...@ma...>]

On Feb 16, 2004, at 7:50 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> Aside: I just had a look at the Cocoa Bindings documentation, and was 
>> very impressed. I do hope we will be able to exploit this from PyObjC 
>> as seamlessly as possible, and if my (still very, very limited) 
>> understanding of PyObjC serves me right, following the K-V standards 
>> is still a stumbling block, and this would definitely help. Please 
>> correct me if I got it all wrong, and it is totally unrelated after 
>> all!
>
> I must admit that I haven't read those documents yet, and haven't done 
> much with Cocoa Bindinds, but it is my intention that Cocoa Bindings 
> "just work" without special code in python. We're probably not there 
> yet, although Cocoa Bindings should work just fine.

It mostly "just works" right now.  There are a couple of areas that 
have been problematic in the past, but I believe they have mostly been 
fixed.

It is on my rather long todo list to right a series of unit tests 
against KVO and KVC that exercise all the myriad of features 
thoroughly.   Since that particular task coincides nicely with my day 
job, it may actually get done.   Having a thorough test of KVO/KVC from 
a bridged language will actually be very helpful to me.

b.bum