Re: [Pyobjc-dev] PyObjC 0.8 Release Candidate

[Ronald O. <ous...@ci...>]

On Thursday, Dec 19, 2002, at 15:50 Europe/Amsterdam, Bill Bumgarner 
wrote:

> I'm going to go ahead and change the way that automatically generated 
> files are used such that it should be obvious what the 10.1 files 
> should be named.  If someone can generate 10.1 headers, I would be 
> happy to plug 'em in.

Please do so after releasing 0.8. BTW. I've installed at the release 
candidate and it looks fine.
>
> Given that 10.1 requires a full python installation from a third party 
> and that it is very likely that the pyobjc module built for one 
> installation will not be compatible with another installation due to 
> linking problems, I don't think it is worthwhile to go down the path 
> of building a PyObjC.pkg for 10.1.

Agreed. If someone is adventureous enough to build Python for 10.1 she 
can also build PyObjC.

Ronald