Re: [Pyobjc-dev] PyObjc and GNUstep
Brought to you by:
ronaldoussoren
From: Ronald O. <ous...@ci...> - 2002-10-30 16:22:01
|
On Wednesday, Oct 30, 2002, at 16:29 Europe/Amsterdam, bb...@ma... wrote: > (Ronald: I feel that the test/ directories should ship with the > 'binary distribution' in the location that they are in. Normally, > the python distribution ships with the unittests and it has been > incredibly helpful to be able to wander into an alien python > installation, run the unit tests, and see exactly what was built into > the distribution in a working fashion.... for us, it means that the > user community can easily validate whether PyObjC still works after a > system update from Apple.) Agreed. I've noticed how usefull this is w.r.t. testing of prereleases of MacPython. Adding a script in that runs all tests would also be usefull. This would have to run all test_*.py scripts in a new interpreter: It is highly likely that some tests will depend on having some modules loaded or not loaded (e.g. testing if importing AppKit makes available extra categories on a number of Foundation classes). Ronald |