Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Functions in the Objective-C method table

[Jack J. <Jac...@or...>]

On dinsdag, oktober 8, 2002, at 03:06 , Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>> The major problem I see with the current version of PyObjC is 
>>> the (large) list of functions that are used in the method 
>>> dispatch tables in Objective-C classes (the file 
>>> 'Modules/objc/register.m'). Using a static list makes the 
>>> compile-time of PyObjC too long and makes it necessary to add 
>>> C module when you want to override methods whose signature is 
>>> not in the table.
>>
>> Is it possible to find out how the ObjC-Java bridge handles 
>> this? It must have the same problems, if I'm not mistaken, and 
>> it'll also have the super method call problem.
>
> I'll take a look at the code generated by bridget, but I 
> wouldn't be surprised if they don't have the same problem 
> because they generate static wrappers.

Uhm... You've lost me here, why would static wrappers make a 
difference? Or are you suggesting that for every method [x] they 
generate both a [object x] and [super x] wrapper?
--
- Jack Jansen        <Jac...@or...>        
http://www.cwi.nl/~jack -
- If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- 
Emma Goldman -