Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Functions in the Objective-C method table

[Ronald O. <ous...@ci...>]

On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:58 Europe/Amsterdam, Jack Jansen wrote:
> On Wednesday, Sep 25, 2002, at 19:23 Europe/Amsterdam, Ronald Oussoren 
> wrote:
>
>> The major problem I see with the current version of PyObjC is the 
>> (large) list of functions that are used in the method dispatch tables 
>> in Objective-C classes (the file 'Modules/objc/register.m'). Using a 
>> static list makes the compile-time of PyObjC too long and makes it 
>> necessary to add C module when you want to override methods whose 
>> signature is not in the table.
>
> Is it possible to find out how the ObjC-Java bridge handles this? It 
> must have the same problems, if I'm not mistaken, and it'll also have 
> the super method call problem.

I'll take a look at the code generated by bridget, but I wouldn't be 
surprised if they don't have the same problem because they generate 
static wrappers.

Ronald