Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Functions in the Objective-C method table
Brought to you by:
ronaldoussoren
From: Ronald O. <ous...@ci...> - 2002-10-08 13:06:53
|
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:58 Europe/Amsterdam, Jack Jansen wrote: > On Wednesday, Sep 25, 2002, at 19:23 Europe/Amsterdam, Ronald Oussoren > wrote: > >> The major problem I see with the current version of PyObjC is the >> (large) list of functions that are used in the method dispatch tables >> in Objective-C classes (the file 'Modules/objc/register.m'). Using a >> static list makes the compile-time of PyObjC too long and makes it >> necessary to add C module when you want to override methods whose >> signature is not in the table. > > Is it possible to find out how the ObjC-Java bridge handles this? It > must have the same problems, if I'm not mistaken, and it'll also have > the super method call problem. I'll take a look at the code generated by bridget, but I wouldn't be surprised if they don't have the same problem because they generate static wrappers. Ronald |