Re: [Pyobjc-dev] pyobjc on 2.2.1 & non-framework builds

[Ronald O. <ous...@ci...>]

On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 19:13 Europe/Amsterdam, Bill Bumgarner 
wrote:

> I'll have to revisit Jack's PythonLauncher when I have more time-- it 
> has some serious issues/bugs.

Such as? IMHO it would be better not to fork python, the situation is 
hazy enough. I'd like to see a python-based PythonLauncher in the 
future, but that is a completely different story.

>
> It also requires a framework build of python.  This is completely 
> unnecessary and incurs an arbitrary limitation [user has to have 
> Python.framework around as opposed to using the standard 
> out-of-the-box Python included with 10.2].

Is the framework really necessary or is it only required because of the 
current build procedure?

BTW. I'd prefer to have a framework install of python as the standard 
python sometime in the future. Maybe in MacOSX 10.4........

Ronald