Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Bridge Support Performances
Brought to you by:
ronaldoussoren
From: Ronald O. <ron...@ma...> - 2010-01-20 21:55:21
|
On 20 Jan, 2010, at 22:52, Virgil Dupras wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Leonardo Santagada > <san...@gm...> wrote: >> >> On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> >>> On 20 Jan, 2010, at 12:30, Virgil Dupras wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> I recently started to use PyObjC 2.2 (after having use 1.4 for a long >>>> time), mainly for 64-bit support, and the biggest problem I have with >>>> it is bridge support's memory usage. One of my applications which used >>>> to use 22mb of memory on launch when built with pyobjc 1.4 used 48mb >>>> when built with pyobjc 2.2. >>> >>> Ouch. >> >> Can it be that a good part of this doubling in size is just from pointers going from 32 to 64bits? >> >> -- >> Leonardo Santagada >> santagada at gmail.com >> >> >> >> > > No, 48mb is in 32bit mode. When in 64-bit mode, it's 95mb This definitly needs time with a measurement tool then, I wouldn't have expected that the amount of memory used would actually double in 64-bit mode. Ronald |