Re: [Pyobjc-dev] Dumb Question (Python 3.0)

[Orestis M. <or...@or...>]

I haven't seen any checkins relating to Python 3 yet, so barring any  
ultra-secret work on this (or perhaps a branch I haven't noticed), I'd  
say that Python 3 work hasn't even started yet.

That said, the safest bet is to use the current stable, released  
version of PyObjC, or even helping out with the 2.2 beta.

I'm confused about the "purely Objective-C" option. That is clearly  
the safest thing to do, but you will not gain any of the benefits  
PyObjC gives you.

With regard to 10.6, even if Ronald has done any work on it, he's  
probably under NDA and will not be able to confirm anything at this  
point.

Orestis
--
or...@or...
http://orestis.gr/




On 15 May 2009, at 19:25, Ilan Volow wrote:

>
> I've googled around for a little while, and I haven't found a clear,
> up-to-date answer on this.
>
> Does PyObjc work with Python 3.0 yet, or is it still a work in
> process? Would betting on Python 3.0+PyObjC working together in 10.6
> be a sure bet, or should I take the safe route and write my project
> purely in Objective-C for the time being?
>
> -- Ilan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
> unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
> for externally facing server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Pyobjc-dev mailing list
> Pyo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyobjc-dev