Buz Barstow wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm considering purchasing a new graphics workstation for molecular
> graphics and macromolecular refinement. I'm considering buying a
> machine with 2 quad core xeon processors, and a nVidia Quadro FX
> graphics card with 1.5 Gb of memory.
>
> Can the current generation of software, and maybe the next generation
> of visualization software, make use of a system with so many
> processors, or am I better off spending the money elsewhere?
>
> Thanks! and all the best,
>
> --Buz
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> PyM...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
>
Pymol will use all 4 cores of my Q9300 processor, but most XRD
applications (CCP4, O, EPMR, etc.) will only use one core at a time
currently. Of course, with more cores, you can run more jobs at once
without significant penalty (depending on how memory- or disk-bound they
are). I built my last Linux workstation around a very inexpensive DG35EC
Intel motherboard and a value-oriented Intel Q9300 quad-core CPU, and
attached a 9600GT graphics card (non-stereo-enabled) and a 24" LCD
panel. For less than $1500 this configuration is pretty quick for
routine crystallography tasks. You don't really need much in the way of
hardware for XRD data processing. For image processing and movie-making
in Pymol, for example, the extra cores really shine, though.
Cheers,
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger S. Rowlett
Professor
Colgate University Presidential Scholar
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346
tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rro...@ma...
|
