You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(35) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(67) |
2003 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(93) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(86) |
2004 |
Jan
(83) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(112) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(32) |
2005 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(111) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(120) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(143) |
Aug
(129) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(125) |
Dec
(65) |
2006 |
Jan
(95) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(87) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(88) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(60) |
2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(82) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(68) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(17) |
2008 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(30) |
2009 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(53) |
2010 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(95) |
Mar
(127) |
Apr
(110) |
May
(135) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(79) |
Sep
(136) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(64) |
2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(109) |
Mar
(191) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(94) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(127) |
Sep
(135) |
Oct
(113) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(140) |
2012 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(131) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(65) |
2013 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(77) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(99) |
Dec
(50) |
2014 |
Jan
(89) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(70) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(57) |
2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(99) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(51) |
2016 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(26) |
2017 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(29) |
2018 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(17) |
2019 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(19) |
2020 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
2021 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(25) |
2022 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(4) |
2023 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
2025 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-02-07 01:42:05
|
PyMOL Version 0.78 is now available for download from http://pymol.sf.net I'm pleased to announce my first release of PyMOL Linux RPMs, which were made possible with assistance from Stephen Adler (Brookhaven NL). These should greatly simplify the installation process for RedHat 7.x users. Thanks a bunch Stephen!!! Along with bufixes, version 0.78 contains a prelimarily release of PyMOL's new "Sculpting" capability. With "Auto-Sculpting" on in Editing Mode, you can simply CTRL-click-and-drag atoms to where you want them to go, and then PyMOL will do its best to make sure that bonds, angles, planarity, chirality, and van der Waals radii are maintained. It's not particularly realistic, but it sure looks cool -- as if your molecules were made of "gummy" worms candy... =20 - Warren |
From: Stephen A. <ad...@bn...> - 2002-02-05 19:06:47
|
Warren, in launch_pymol.py there is the following code sys.path.append(os.environ['PYMOL_PATH']+'/modules') It looks to me like your adding $PYMOL_PATH/modules to the path of modules searched by python. Right now, there is no modules directory in the final installation. Should I create one and put all the .so files in there? Right now I define $PYMOL_PATH=/usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol Where pymol has a bunch of .so files and some directories (no modules directory) with various __init__.py files. But it still starts up fine. Its like the sys.path.append does not seem to do much. What do you suggest? Steve. |
From: Stephen A. <ad...@bn...> - 2002-02-05 18:46:22
|
Warren, This is what I'm going to do. I've kludge up the installation on my PC to run pymol. I've been able to download a .pdb file from the PDB and actually display a protien structure. (Really cool!) I'm going to try and rationalize my kludges so that anyone who installs the rpm's just has to type 'pymol' under linux and bingo, their off and running. There are a couple of tricks I can apply to the installation to make it integrate better with redhat linux. Also, I'm going to shy away from pulling the code out of CVS. Since I'm building RPM's, this does suggest some kind of stable release, even tho it's a moving target. So that fact that you went through the trouble of putting a .tar.gz file for .73 must mean that .73 has some significance of some sort. Maybe in the near future I can work on some kind of nightly build option or something which does pull the code right out of CVS. Cheers Steve. DeLano, Warren wrote: > Stephen, > > Glad to see you're interested! O'Reilly was a blast... > > Right now PyMOL is more of a continuous process rather than a discrete > set of release stages. Try building off of the CVS source. > > In theory, the 'ext' distribution contains all the dependencies you need > (including Pmw and Numeric), but most of those are now getting to be > quite out of date. Yu're best off assembling all of the necessary > dependencies from their respective web sites. Please use Python 2.1 or > greater. > > PyMOL isn't really a well behaved Python module, right now. That will > change soon. The problem is that PyMOL needs a bit more coddling than a > normal Python module in order to run. You can stick all of PyMOL under > /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol, but you'll need to adjust > PYMOLPATH accordingly in the "pymol.com" script, and you'll want to copy > or link that script to someplace useful (such as /usr/local/bin). > > >>Ok, after googling the term Numeric I've come across >>Numpy which looks to be Numeric. From what I can tell, it >>looks like Numeric (or Numpy) is not distributed with redhat >>and thus a seperate installation is necessary. Thus the >>numeric rpms on the pymol site. If this were to be done >>right, the numeric rpms should be located in the numpy >>site, rather than the pymol site. I'm wondering if this >>goes for Pwm as well.... >> > > - Warren > |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-02-05 17:38:24
|
Stephen, Glad to see you're interested! O'Reilly was a blast... Right now PyMOL is more of a continuous process rather than a discrete set of release stages. Try building off of the CVS source. In theory, the 'ext' distribution contains all the dependencies you need (including Pmw and Numeric), but most of those are now getting to be quite out of date. Yu're best off assembling all of the necessary dependencies from their respective web sites. Please use Python 2.1 or greater. PyMOL isn't really a well behaved Python module, right now. That will change soon. The problem is that PyMOL needs a bit more coddling than a normal Python module in order to run. You can stick all of PyMOL under /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol, but you'll need to adjust PYMOLPATH accordingly in the "pymol.com" script, and you'll want to copy or link that script to someplace useful (such as /usr/local/bin). > Ok, after googling the term Numeric I've come across > Numpy which looks to be Numeric. From what I can tell, it > looks like Numeric (or Numpy) is not distributed with redhat > and thus a seperate installation is necessary. Thus the > numeric rpms on the pymol site. If this were to be done > right, the numeric rpms should be located in the numpy > site, rather than the pymol site. I'm wondering if this > goes for Pwm as well.... - Warren |
From: Stephen A. <ad...@bn...> - 2002-02-05 17:17:34
|
Sorry about flooding the e-mail list with the following questions comments.... My attempt at rebuilding a version 0.73 of pymol failed. It did so becuase of the following detail. In the build area, there is a module directory which contains the following.... [root@newadler modules]# pwd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pymol/modules [root@newadler modules]# ls -Fa ./ ExtensionClass.so* _openglmodule.so* pmg_wx/ ../ _glumodule.so* _opengl_nummodule.so* pymol/ chempy/ _glu_nummodule.so* openglutil_num.so* sglite.so* _cmd.so* _glutmodule.so* openglutil.so* CVS/ launch_pymol.py pmg_tk/ When doing the rpm build, the rpm package manager takes care of moving all the directories into /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/ But the files in the 'modules' directory, are left orphand. The question is where to put them, since putting them in the directory /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/ seems a bit wonko. For now, I'm going to put them in /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/pymol for a lack of a better place to put them. Maybe it will become clear where they should go after screwing around a bit with this rpm build. Cheers. Steve. |
From: Stephen A. <ad...@bn...> - 2002-02-05 16:28:29
|
Ok, after googling the term Numeric I've come across Numpy which looks to be Numeric. From what I can tell, it looks like Numeric (or Numpy) is not distributed with redhat and thus a seperate installation is necessary. Thus the numeric rpms on the pymol site. If this were to be done right, the numeric rpms should be located in the numpy site, rather than the pymol site. I'm wondering if this goes for Pwm as well.... comments? Steve. |
From: Stephen A. <ad...@bn...> - 2002-02-05 15:21:19
|
Hi, I want to build updated RPM's for pymol. I see that version 0.73 is on sourceforge. I also see that there are version 0.68 rpm packages for redhat. I also see that there is a version 0.77 of pymol binaries for windows. so, in order to get the most out of this rpm hack, what should I do? Should I try and do a CVS checkout of .77 and build that? Or should I just stick with .73? also, what about Pwm and Numeric. Are the versions in the current RPM's sufficient? Thanks. Steve. |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-02-05 01:31:30
|
Michael, Try checking out a new copy of the source code from the current CVS repository -- the Makefiles have been simplified somewhat, so compilation under Linux may go easier. You should only need to change the Python version in one place : ) Read "INSTALL.linux-rh7x" Cheers, Warren -- mailto:wa...@su... Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D. Informatics Manager Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 341 Oyster Point Blvd. S. San Francisco, CA 94080 (650)-266-3606 FAX:(650)-266-3501 > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael George Lerner [mailto:ml...@um...] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:44 PM > To: pym...@so... > Subject: [PyMOL] Installing from source on a linux box >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I have PyMol up and running on my windows partition .. the=20 > installation > was super easy. Now, I want to set it up on my Linux=20 > partition. I have > Mandrake 8.1 installed, which means that my default python=20 > version is 2.1. > It also means that many things (Numeric, zlib, etc..) are=20 > pre-installed > for me. >=20 > So, I downloaded the PyMol sources and tried to install it. In the > external packages bit, it looked like the only thing I need=20 > is glut. So, > I changed the setenv BASE line in build.com to point to the=20 > right place > (/home/mglerner/src/pymol/ext in my case) and changed the setenv > PYMOL_TARGETS line to say "glut-linux" and did "./build.com". I also > tried "./build.com glut-linux" for variety .. both seemed to work. >=20 > Then I went up a directory into the main pymol directory. I=20 > then moved > Rules.linux to Rules.make and edited it. There were many instances of > -lpython1.5 .. I changed all of them to -lpython2.1. It was=20 > still having > some trouble finding libpython2.1, so I added=20 > -L/usr/lib/python2.1/config > to the LIB_DIRS line. After typing make, things get pretty=20 > far, but it > doesn't get far enough. I wasn't sure how many of the error=20 > messages to > include, but I've tacked on the last screen or so of output=20 > at the end of > this message. >=20 > There were some things that made me think that various parts=20 > of this build > process were really looking for python sources in the ext=20 > directory, so I > placed a copy of the python 2.1 sources there just in case. It didn't > seem to help. >=20 > Sorry if this is a dumb question, >=20 > -michael >=20 > ------ begin output from make ------ >=20 > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > rm -f *.o *~ > rm -f *.a tags TAGS config.c Makefile.pre python sedscript > rm -f *.so *.sl so_locations > VERSION=3D`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print=20 > sys.version[:3]"`; \ > installdir=3D`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print sys.prefix"`; = \ > exec_installdir=3D`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print > sys.exec_prefix"`; \make -f ./Makefile.pre.in VPATH=3D. srcdir=3D. \ > VERSION=3D$VERSION \ > installdir=3D$installdir \ > exec_installdir=3D$exec_installdir \ > Makefile > /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory > /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory > /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > make[3]: *** No rule to make target=20 > `/lib/python/config/Makefile', needed > by `sedscript'. Stop. > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > make[2]: *** [boot] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > make[1]: *** [make-modules] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib' > make: *** [.contrib] Error 2 >=20 > ------ end output from make ------ >=20 > -- > This isn't a democracy;| _ |Michael Lerner > it's a cheer-ocracy. | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | Michigan > -Torrence, Bring It On| - against HTML email X | Biophysics > | / \ | mlerner@umich >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users >=20 |
From: Ezequiel P. <za...@SL...> - 2002-02-04 19:31:43
|
A good tip when rendering unusual aspect ratio images is to set the viewport with the same aspect ratio as the final rendered image to better use the image area. It also helps to avoid unexpected crops due to the change in the aspect ratio. Cheers, Zac On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, DeLano, Warren wrote: > Jason, > > The resolution field in images is not uniformly supported or > understood, so the safest policy is to ignore it and stick with 72 dpi > for your images. As far as I can tell from the man page, PNG format > doesn't even support a DPI field. Just make sure that your image > contain enough pixels to look good when reduced. The page layout staff > at the journal are usually professionals and will take care of adjusting > the final image size and resolution provided that you give them enough > pixels to start with. > > For example, if you are submitting something which will end up being > 4x3 inches when published, then you want to give them a 4x300=1200 by > 3x300=900 pixel image. Thus, use the command "ray 1200,900" and then > save the file. For submission, you'll probably need to use Photoshop or > the ImageMagick "convert" command to convert this file into something > they can handle. > > To cite PyMOL, either use the URL: > > Warren L. DeLano "The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System." > DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA. http://www.pymol.org > > or cite the manual as a book > > Warren L. DeLano (2002) "The PyMOL User's Manual" > DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA. > > Cheers, > Warren > > -- > mailto:wa...@su... > Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D. > Informatics Manager > Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. > 341 Oyster Point Blvd. > S. San Francisco, CA 94080 > (650)-266-3606 FAX:(650)-266-3501 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Yano [mailto:jk...@br...] > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:33 AM > > To: DeLano, Warren > > Subject: Resolution increase > > > > > > Hey Warren, > > I want use one of the images that I made in PyMOL for > > publication, > > but I would like to increase the output resolution to 300 > > dpi, right now > > the program spits out images at 72 dpi. I have tried to do this > > artificially in photoshop, but the image doesn't look any > > better. Whats > > the easest way to increase the resolution? > > > > By the way how would you like me to reference the program in the > > publication? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users > -- Ezequiel Panepucci - Laboratory of Prof. Axel Brunger HHMI - Stanford University Phone: 650-926-5127 Cell: 650-714-9414 |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-02-04 18:56:08
|
Jason, The resolution field in images is not uniformly supported or understood, so the safest policy is to ignore it and stick with 72 dpi for your images. As far as I can tell from the man page, PNG format doesn't even support a DPI field. Just make sure that your image contain enough pixels to look good when reduced. The page layout staff at the journal are usually professionals and will take care of adjusting the final image size and resolution provided that you give them enough pixels to start with. For example, if you are submitting something which will end up being 4x3 inches when published, then you want to give them a 4x300=3D1200 by 3x300=3D900 pixel image. Thus, use the command "ray 1200,900" and then save the file. For submission, you'll probably need to use Photoshop or the ImageMagick "convert" command to convert this file into something they can handle. To cite PyMOL, either use the URL: =20 Warren L. DeLano "The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System." DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA. http://www.pymol.org or cite the manual as a book Warren L. DeLano (2002) "The PyMOL User's Manual"=20 DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA. Cheers, Warren -- mailto:wa...@su... Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D. Informatics Manager Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 341 Oyster Point Blvd. S. San Francisco, CA 94080 (650)-266-3606 FAX:(650)-266-3501 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Yano [mailto:jk...@br...] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:33 AM > To: DeLano, Warren > Subject: Resolution increase >=20 >=20 > Hey Warren, > I want use one of the images that I made in PyMOL for=20 > publication, > but I would like to increase the output resolution to 300=20 > dpi, right now > the program spits out images at 72 dpi. I have tried to do this > artificially in photoshop, but the image doesn't look any=20 > better. Whats > the easest way to increase the resolution? >=20 > By the way how would you like me to reference the program in the > publication? >=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > Jason >=20 >=20 >=20 |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-02-02 01:15:25
|
Jose,=20 I'm not sure what you mean by weak (invisible, ??), but try adjusting the setting "mesh_radius" set mesh_radius=3D0.025 ray set mesh_radius=3D0.05 ray set mesh_raidus=3D0.1 ray etc. also, try enabling antialiasing set antialias=3D1 Cheers, Warren -- mailto:wa...@su... Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D. Informatics Manager Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 341 Oyster Point Blvd. S. San Francisco, CA 94080 (650)-266-3606 FAX:(650)-266-3501 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jose Casasnovas [mailto:jos...@cb...] > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:18 AM > To: pym...@li... > Subject: [PyMOL] map rendering >=20 >=20 > I am trying to render a figure with several ribbons and a map. After=20 > rendering either in Pymol or Povray ribbons came fine, but=20 > map is very=20 > weak. Any help on settings to get a map render properly. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Jose > ________________________________________ > Jose M Casasnovas Ph.D. > Karolinska Institutet > Department of Biosciences > NOVUM, Center for Biotechnology > Halsov=E4gen 7 > S-141 57 HUDDINGE > Sweden > Ph. 46 8 6089133 > Fax. 46 8 7745538 > email: jos...@cb... >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users >=20 |
From: Culhane, A. <a.c...@uc...> - 2002-01-29 11:41:02
|
Dear Pymol I am having lots of difficulty installing Pymol (and its dependencies) on Tru64 5.1. I already had python2.1, Numpy, Tcl, Tk etc installed. Hence I choose not to re-install using the extensions. I downloaded libpng, so all I had to do was sort Glut. I have tried downloading this again from the OpenGL web site, but it will fall over each time. Hence Pymol falls over. I would be very grateful if anyone can help or has experience of installing these on Tru64 v5.1 (OSF1/DEC). Thanks a million Aedin Culhane ------------------------------- Bioinformatics Group Biochemistry Department Lee Maltings, University College Cork Cork, Ireland |
From: Warren L. D. <wa...@su...> - 2002-01-29 01:31:06
|
Michael, Python dependencies are better handled in the current source archive (available from the CVS repository). See the "CVS Installation" section of the web page. You should be able to quickly adapt Rules.linux-rh7x file to create a "Rules.make" for Mandrake. Cheers, Warren On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Michael George Lerner wrote: > I have PyMol up and running on my windows partition .. the > installation was super easy. Now, I want to set it up on my Linux > partition. I have Mandrake 8.1 installed, which means that my default > python version is 2.1. It also means that many things (Numeric, zlib, > etc..) are pre-installed for me. > > So, I downloaded the PyMol sources and tried to install it. In the > external packages bit, it looked like the only thing I need is glut. So, > I changed the setenv BASE line in build.com to point to the right place > (/home/mglerner/src/pymol/ext in my case) and changed the setenv > PYMOL_TARGETS line to say "glut-linux" and did "./build.com". I also > tried "./build.com glut-linux" for variety .. both seemed to work. > > Then I went up a directory into the main pymol directory. I then moved > Rules.linux to Rules.make and edited it. There were many instances of > -lpython1.5 .. I changed all of them to -lpython2.1. It was still having > some trouble finding libpython2.1, so I added -L/usr/lib/python2.1/config > to the LIB_DIRS line. After typing make, things get pretty far, but it > doesn't get far enough. I wasn't sure how many of the error messages to > include, but I've tacked on the last screen or so of output at the end of > this message. > > There were some things that made me think that various parts of this build > process were really looking for python sources in the ext directory, so I > placed a copy of the python 2.1 sources there just in case. It didn't > seem to help. > > Sorry if this is a dumb question, > > -michael > > ------ begin output from make ------ > > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > rm -f *.o *~ > rm -f *.a tags TAGS config.c Makefile.pre python sedscript > rm -f *.so *.sl so_locations > VERSION=`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print sys.version[:3]"`; \ > installdir=`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print sys.prefix"`; \ > exec_installdir=`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print > sys.exec_prefix"`; \make -f ./Makefile.pre.in VPATH=. srcdir=. \ > VERSION=$VERSION \ > installdir=$installdir \ > exec_installdir=$exec_installdir \ > Makefile > /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory > /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory > /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/lib/python/config/Makefile', needed > by `sedscript'. Stop. > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > make[2]: *** [boot] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' > make[1]: *** [make-modules] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib' > make: *** [.contrib] Error 2 > > ------ end output from make ------ > > -- > This isn't a democracy;| _ |Michael Lerner > it's a cheer-ocracy. | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | Michigan > -Torrence, Bring It On| - against HTML email X | Biophysics > | / \ | mlerner@umich > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users > |
From: Jason Y. <jk...@br...> - 2002-01-28 23:57:49
|
Hi All, I just wanted to know if there is an easy way to change the resolution of the images from 72 pixels/inch to something like 150 pixels/inch either by a pymol command or a python one. Jason |
From: Michael G. L. <ml...@um...> - 2002-01-28 21:43:54
|
Hi, I have PyMol up and running on my windows partition .. the installation was super easy. Now, I want to set it up on my Linux partition. I have Mandrake 8.1 installed, which means that my default python version is 2.1. It also means that many things (Numeric, zlib, etc..) are pre-installed for me. So, I downloaded the PyMol sources and tried to install it. In the external packages bit, it looked like the only thing I need is glut. So, I changed the setenv BASE line in build.com to point to the right place (/home/mglerner/src/pymol/ext in my case) and changed the setenv PYMOL_TARGETS line to say "glut-linux" and did "./build.com". I also tried "./build.com glut-linux" for variety .. both seemed to work. Then I went up a directory into the main pymol directory. I then moved Rules.linux to Rules.make and edited it. There were many instances of -lpython1.5 .. I changed all of them to -lpython2.1. It was still having some trouble finding libpython2.1, so I added -L/usr/lib/python2.1/config to the LIB_DIRS line. After typing make, things get pretty far, but it doesn't get far enough. I wasn't sure how many of the error messages to include, but I've tacked on the last screen or so of output at the end of this message. There were some things that made me think that various parts of this build process were really looking for python sources in the ext directory, so I placed a copy of the python 2.1 sources there just in case. It didn't seem to help. Sorry if this is a dumb question, -michael ------ begin output from make ------ make[2]: Entering directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' rm -f *.o *~ rm -f *.a tags TAGS config.c Makefile.pre python sedscript rm -f *.so *.sl so_locations VERSION=`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print sys.version[:3]"`; \ installdir=`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print sys.prefix"`; \ exec_installdir=`../../ext/bin/python -c "import sys; print sys.exec_prefix"`; \make -f ./Makefile.pre.in VPATH=. srcdir=. \ VERSION=$VERSION \ installdir=$installdir \ exec_installdir=$exec_installdir \ Makefile /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory /bin/sh: ../../ext/bin/python: No such file or directory make[3]: Entering directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/lib/python/config/Makefile', needed by `sedscript'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' make[2]: *** [boot] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib/modules' make[1]: *** [make-modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mglerner/src/pymol/contrib' make: *** [.contrib] Error 2 ------ end output from make ------ -- This isn't a democracy;| _ |Michael Lerner it's a cheer-ocracy. | ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | Michigan -Torrence, Bring It On| - against HTML email X | Biophysics | / \ | mlerner@umich |
From: Jose C. <jos...@cb...> - 2002-01-28 15:18:26
|
I am trying to render a figure with several ribbons and a map. After=20 rendering either in Pymol or Povray ribbons came fine, but map is very=20 weak. Any help on settings to get a map render properly. Thanks, Jose ________________________________________ Jose M Casasnovas Ph.D. Karolinska Institutet Department of Biosciences NOVUM, Center for Biotechnology Halsov=E4gen 7 S-141 57 HUDDINGE Sweden Ph. 46 8 6089133 Fax. 46 8 7745538 email: jos...@cb... |
From: Ben C. <ac...@em...> - 2002-01-28 14:00:13
|
Jason Yano <jk...@br...> writes: > Hi All, > I just wanted to know if there was a way to include resolution > and pixels per inch ie 150 or 300 rather than the default of 72 > pixles/inch in the .pml scritp ie > Just provide `ray' with an optional width and height. Ben |
From: Jason Y. <jk...@br...> - 2002-01-28 00:12:11
|
Hi All, I just wanted to know if there was a way to include resolution and pixels per inch ie 150 or 300 rather than the default of 72 pixles/inch in the .pml scritp ie [1280x1024, 150pixels/inch] ray png image_name.png Jason |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-01-27 21:27:02
|
> From: Eric C. Peterson [mailto:ec...@ua...] > I am putting some figures together for an upcoming manuscript=20 > and am trying > to figure out a few details. Some of the things I want to do may be > possible, some not. Here are the questions I have: >=20 > 1. How do you display electrostatic potential on surface displays? Not yet directly possible, but that will change soon. The nearest thing you can achieve is to color by charge. =20 > 2. Can the colors of individual side chains be changed=20 > without affecting the > surface? If you want a uniform surface color, set surface_color, <color-name>, <object-name> For anything complicated, just create a second copy of the object. Show the surface in one and sticks in the other. Then color independently. =20 > 3. I have tried to assign SS manually, but the cartoon skips=20 > at certain > sections (ie alpha helices). What can I do to fix this? Hmm. This should happen unless those atoms are HETATMS. To be sure: show cartoon alter all,type=3D'ATOM' rebuild I'm a little suspicious that there might be some lingering bugs in the ribbon code. If you have an example PDB file and script which reproduces the problem, please send them to me. |
From: Jason Y. <jk...@br...> - 2002-01-27 03:15:50
|
Hi All, I'm looking for a way to display a "ball and Stick" representation of an Fe-S cluser, with a cartoon for the protein back bone. I can get the spheres for the Fe-S cluster, but can't connect them. Here's the script so far. #Pymol script for Adx 1AYF load C:\Documents and Settings\jkyano\My Documents\P450 pdb\1AYF_A.pdb, ADX bg white ### cut below here and paste into script ### set_view (\ -0.057087217, 0.618627429, -0.783607304,\ 0.026588190, 0.785550535, 0.618226647,\ 0.998013437, 0.014458310, -0.061293427,\ -1.276597023, 0.201005965, -106.195739746,\ -12.916477203, -11.231512070, -8.815745354,\ 74.405113220, 137.986404419, 0.000000000 ) ### cut above here and paste into script ### util.ss color slate, ADX hide everything, ADX show cartoon, ADX select fes =(resid 109) show sphere, fes color yellow, fes alter (name s1), vdw=.75 alter (name s2), vdw=.75 rebuild sel elem fe color marine, fe Thanks for the help, Jason |
From: proclus r. <pr...@in...> - 2002-01-27 00:47:52
|
Announcing PyMOL for GNU-Darwin on Intel architecture (x86)! terminal shot http://gnu-darwin.sourceforge.net/gdc/pymol.x86.png sample graphic http://gnu-darwin.sourceforge.net/gdc/pymol2.x86.png installation script (for Intel only!) http://gnu-darwin.sourceforge.net/gdc/pymol-x86 The installation script provides ncurses-5.2.x86.tgz python-2.2_1.x86.tgz tcl-8.3.4_3.x86.tgz tk-8.3.4_1.x86.tgz py22-numeric-20.2.1.x86.tgz py22-tkinter-2.2.x86.tgz and pymol-0_73_1.x86.tgz. For more information about the x86 platform, see the ports and packages page for GNU-Darwin-x86. http://gnu-darwin.sourceforge.net/x86/ PyMOL now builds automatically with the ports system, and required source code is in CVS. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gnu-darwin/4Darwin-x86/ports/science/pymol/ BTW. This japanese Balsa now appears to be working pretty well ;-}. Heave Ho! Regards, Michael L. Love MacCHESS Cornell University http://www.gnu-darwin.org/ -- Visit proclus realm! http://proclus.tripod.com/ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GMU/S d+@ s: a+ C++++ UBOULI++++$ P+ L+++(++++) E--- W++ N- !o K- w--- !O M++@ V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-- t+++(+) 5+++ X+ R tv-(--)@ b !DI D- G e++++ h--- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Eric C. P. <ec...@ua...> - 2002-01-25 23:00:43
|
First of all, I am quite impressed with this program, free or not. I also saw Dr. Wells speak at the Keystone conference in Breckenridge in January where he presented some graphics using Rigimol. Very nice. I am putting some figures together for an upcoming manuscript and am trying to figure out a few details. Some of the things I want to do may be possible, some not. Here are the questions I have: 1. How do you display electrostatic potential on surface displays? 2. Can the colors of individual side chains be changed without affecting the surface? 3. I have tried to assign SS manually, but the cartoon skips at certain sections (ie alpha helices). What can I do to fix this? Any help is appreciated. Thanks. Eric Peterson Ph.D. Candidate Cell and Molecular Biology 19 West Avenue Annex University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 (501) 575-3021 Fax (501) 575-8434 |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-01-24 03:46:30
|
Don't you hate it when users outsmart the programmer? This is a tough one. The only solution I can think of is not memory efficient, but it should work: Load each frame of the movie into a separate segment or chain. This should allow you to independently address each frame... # assume that the segment is '' (empty) in the PDB files... load frame1.pdb,mov alter (segi ''),segi=3D'1' load frame2.pdb,mov alter (segi ''),segi=3D'2' etc.=20 You can use Python to make a loop by switching to the Python API as follows: from pymol import cmd for a in range(1,30): cmd.load("frame%d.pdb"%a,"mov") cmd.alter("(segi '')","segi=3D'%d'"%a) Then you should be able to say: color red,/mov/1//101/ca color red,/mov/2//101/ca color red,/mov/3//101/ca Good luck, Warren -- mailto:wa...@su... Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D. Informatics Manager Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 341 Oyster Point Blvd. S. San Francisco, CA 94080 (650)-266-3606 FAX:(650)-266-3501 > -----Original Message----- > From: Nat [mailto:nat...@ya...] > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:39 PM > To: pym...@li... > Subject: [PyMOL] movie frame alterations >=20 >=20 >=20 > Is it possible to make changes to the way individual frames=20 > are rendered? > Specifically, I'm writing a Python script (translated=20 > literally from C, > but I'm too tired to learn the Python API right now) to evaluate bond > "quality" and highlight the distorted regions in a frame of a protein > morph. However, since the distortions tend to come in the middle of a > morph, I want to examine each frame alone and apply highlighting only > where applicable. >=20 > Right now, treating individual frames as part of an object (i.e. for a > movie) means that calls like 'color red, 101/ca' are applied to every > state. Is there some way to only run that command on one state? In > simple terms, I'm trying for a movie that changes color=20 > during its course > to indicate bond quality. It's much easier to do this if I=20 > can use movie > objects, especially since it would be nice to be able to run this > interactively. Otherwise, I'm going to just create a very=20 > long pml file > with all the commands. >=20 > thanks, > Nat >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users >=20 |
From: Nat <nat...@ya...> - 2002-01-24 03:38:53
|
Is it possible to make changes to the way individual frames are rendered? Specifically, I'm writing a Python script (translated literally from C, but I'm too tired to learn the Python API right now) to evaluate bond "quality" and highlight the distorted regions in a frame of a protein morph. However, since the distortions tend to come in the middle of a morph, I want to examine each frame alone and apply highlighting only where applicable. Right now, treating individual frames as part of an object (i.e. for a movie) means that calls like 'color red, 101/ca' are applied to every state. Is there some way to only run that command on one state? In simple terms, I'm trying for a movie that changes color during its course to indicate bond quality. It's much easier to do this if I can use movie objects, especially since it would be nice to be able to run this interactively. Otherwise, I'm going to just create a very long pml file with all the commands. thanks, Nat |
From: DeLano, W. <wa...@su...> - 2002-01-21 21:40:01
|
> From: Ricardo Aparicio [mailto:apa...@if...] > 1) what is the effect of command "stereo" in PyMol? Does it makes a > confuse screen (like in O when one is not using stereo > glasses)? If so, > there is no sense in capture the image from the screen with > png command. No, it just fails altogether.=20 > 2) how to make stereo figures using PyMol. If necessary we have SGIs > with stereo here. Easy -- you do it the old fashion way: png left.png turn y,5 png right.png And then use something like Photoshop or PowerPoint to combine the two images into a single stereo-pair. =20 The above recipe gives you cross-eye. You'll want to play with the angle a bit and or negate it in order to do wall-eye stereo. - Warren |