You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(35) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(67) |
2003 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(93) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(86) |
2004 |
Jan
(83) |
Feb
(90) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(112) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(96) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(32) |
2005 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(111) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(120) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(143) |
Aug
(129) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(125) |
Dec
(65) |
2006 |
Jan
(95) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(87) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(88) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(60) |
2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(82) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(68) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(17) |
2008 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(30) |
2009 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(73) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(53) |
2010 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(95) |
Mar
(127) |
Apr
(110) |
May
(135) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(79) |
Sep
(136) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(64) |
2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(109) |
Mar
(191) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(94) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(127) |
Sep
(135) |
Oct
(113) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(140) |
2012 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(131) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(65) |
2013 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(90) |
Apr
(77) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(99) |
Dec
(50) |
2014 |
Jan
(89) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(70) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(57) |
2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(99) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(51) |
2016 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(68) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(26) |
2017 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(29) |
2018 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(17) |
2019 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(19) |
2020 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(51) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
2021 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(25) |
2022 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(4) |
2023 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
2025 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-11 17:11:02
|
Thank you very much Jared! Could you tell me if you have some cool present for the surface representations ? For example I am using the following script to visualize the surface of the protein around the ligand binding site: cmd.show('surface', 'polymer within 15 of complex* and not polymer') cmd.set('surface_color','marine','polymer') cmd.set('transparency', '0.4') cmd.hide('cartoon', 'all') cmd.png('image.png',width=${image},height=${image},dpi=50,ray=1) It produces a good looking image but the surface looks monotone. How could I improve its representation using some preset?? Cheers, Enrico вт, 11 янв. 2022 г. в 15:58, Jared Sampson <jar...@co...>: > > Hi Enrico - > > If you want to reproduce GUI actions programmatically, you can see what happens under the hood for most things by opening a log file: > > log_open log.pml > > then perform the desired action and the Python API version of the corresponding command will be written to the log file. For example, for the ligand sites > cartoon action menu item, this would be: > > preset.ligand_cartoon("myobject",_self=cmd) > > If you want to use this in a script I think you'll also have to do: > > from pymol import preset > > Hope that helps. > > Cheers, > Jared > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:21 AM Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Dear Pymol Users! >> Is it possible to visualize protein-ligand interactions (which >> normally is achieved in GUI via a - > present -> ligand sites >> using some combination of the pymol commands, which could be scripted >> using cmd. syntax ? >> I've found this explanation >> https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Displaying_Biochemical_Properties#Hydrogen_bonds_and_Polar_Contacts >> but did not understand quite well how it works. >> I would be grateful for the example of the commands which show the >> polar contacts (I am mostly interested in hydrogen bonds) in my pymol >> session without calling each time the GUI menu. >> Many thanks in advance! >> Enrico >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PyMOL-users mailing list >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... >> Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-11 10:20:10
|
Dear Pymol Users! Is it possible to visualize protein-ligand interactions (which normally is achieved in GUI via a - > present -> ligand sites using some combination of the pymol commands, which could be scripted using cmd. syntax ? I've found this explanation https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Displaying_Biochemical_Properties#Hydrogen_bonds_and_Polar_Contacts but did not understand quite well how it works. I would be grateful for the example of the commands which show the polar contacts (I am mostly interested in hydrogen bonds) in my pymol session without calling each time the GUI menu. Many thanks in advance! Enrico |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-11 09:21:14
|
Dear Pymol Users! I am working on the visualization of the ligand binding poses predicted by protein-ligand docking. Having 88 solutions I split these states into different states and then set transparency=0.8 to each of them, in order to visualize them as the "cloud" of the conformational space of the ligand predicted in docking. I also selected the best docking pose (always the first model) and colored it in Red without the transparency. The problem is that, during the visualization, on the png graph, the best docking pose looks to be on the second plane compared to others (transparent) poses. How could I always move this model on the first plane compared to other aligned ligand poses? P.S. I tried to enclose the PNG to my message but it seems that it could not pass the moderator filter .. |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-10 16:37:03
|
Right, thank you, Blaine! It works very well now! Actually there was a problem in the selection from my part so.. I will play with the surfaces a little bit and then will update this topic with my questions :-) Cheers, Enrico пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 16:25, Mooers, Blaine H.M. (HSC) <Bla...@ou...>: > > Hi Enrico, > > You do not need the first line of your script. > > This one-liner worked for me in the terminal. > > pymol -c -d "cmd.fetch('3nd3');cmd.show('surface');cmd.set('transparency','0.5');cmd.save('surf.pse');cmd.png('surf.png')" > > You might test reversing the order of the cmd.png() and cmd.save() commands. > > Best regards, > > Blaine > > Blaine Mooers, Ph.D. > Associate Professor > Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine > Director of the Laboratory of Biomolecular Structure and Function > Academic Director, Biomolecular Structure Core, COBRE in Structural Biology > Full Member, Cancer Biology Program, Stephenson Cancer Center > University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center > > Mailing Address: > 975 NE 10th Street, BRC 466 > Oklahoma City, OK 73104-5419 > Office: 405-271-8300 Lab: 405-271-8312 > > Websites: > Faculty page: https://basicsciences.ouhsc.edu/bmb/Faculty/bio_details/mooers-blaine-hm-phd > BSC-OKC (LBSF): https://research.ouhsc.edu/Core-Facilities/Laboratory-of-Biomolecular-Structure-and-Function > COBRE in Structural Biology: https://www.ou.edu/structuralbiology > ________________________________________ > From: Ali Saad Kusay via PyMOL-users [pym...@li...] > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 8:48 AM > To: Enrico Martinez > Cc: pymol-users > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PyMOL] surface representation of the protein-ligand interactions > > Hi Enrico, > > This is beyond my understanding, try and run this bash script without making the surface transparent (to figure out if the issue comes from the transparency) > > Also try the rebuild command before saving the image: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pymolwiki.org_index.php_Rebuild&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=QM8ZtM6vxjrnYB0Cs6BSV-M8WweuPuuTS1xLMGYQdKU&e= > > Cheers, > > Ali > > Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist > The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health > 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 > > On 10/1/22, 11:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: > > Thank you very much,Ali! > just one question: when I do the surface calculations using bash > script operating with the command lines of the pymol it produces > correctly pse session with the surfaces. BUT if I save an image using > png, the surface is totally absent. Here are my commands directly from > the shell script: > > $pymol -c -d " > from pymol import cmd > cmd.load('${results}/${output}_${lig_name}_${receptor}_rep${i}.pdb') > cmd.show( 'surface', '${output}* and polymer within 15 of ${output}* > and not polymer' ) > cmd.set( 'transparency', '0.5' ) > cmd.save('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.pse') > cmd.png('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.png',width=${image},height=${image},dpi=50,ray=0) > " > As the result of this workflow, the surface is present in the PSE > file but not in the png image. Otherwise when I save png directly from > the pymol's GUI the surface is well captured on the png as well. What > should I include in my script ? > > пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 12:18, Ali Saad Kusay <aku...@un...>: > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > You can carve the protein surface around the ligand, i.e. show only the surface behind the ligand, see this guide: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_1Of6CNLJyQU0W9yVofmRSV0-3Fdomain-3Dpymol.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=eU60ct3XrRn6e7JdG6JrHLyikGkuUbzJY35JQFXvTv8&e= > > > > You can also try and made the surface more transparent, but this doesn't always give the best results, see: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_vdsUCOMKzVTp8wQ53fvOudq-3Fdomain-3Dpymolwiki.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=pOFWGOP750OszaW7BCL8qGLr_VvBCCumHmvodMSYBeo&e= , i.e.: > > > > set transparency, 0.5 > > > > It would help to see an image of what you are working with atm > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ali > > > > Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist > > The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health > > 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 > > > > > > On 10/1/22, 10:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Dear Pymol users! > > Working on the vizualisation of the protein-ligand interactions I > > would like to switch from cartoon to the surface representation of the > > protein, while still being capable to see the ligand-binding cavity > > (as well as non-covalent interactions) > > > > Could you suggest me some combination of the options which could helps > > me with such vizualisaiton? > > I have alread tried > > show surface, all within 5 of my_pdb and not polymer > > set surface_smooth_edges, onset surface_smooth_edges, on > > where my_pdb and not polymer corresponds to the selection of the ligand > > > > Eventualy this create cool surface representation of the protein and > > but completely hides the ligand-binding cavity > > Many thanks in advance! > > Enrico > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PyMOL-users mailing list > > Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_5uDYCP7LAXfKwZVvQF1Df45-3Fdomain-3Dmail-2Darchive.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=f6UjxY4QYDP77HQZ2CqSwjcwA_HDNuyv4cn6nskHIq0&e= > > Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_Q3GJCQnMBZfkQ9ZB7FkIfVr-3Fdomain-3Dsourceforge.net&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=lxdjMlSEnLEry730CbGSXWOU9HvpC8iBFjlmcWohToU&e= > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_pymol-2Dusers-40lists.sourceforge.net&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=jECdW3kdL8QeZ4l5PxiMhbpjSJBrXPLt0KPxa2kpcwI&e= > Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sourceforge.net_projects_pymol_lists_pymol-2Dusers_unsubscribe&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=LFkputyTYxDqA2BAGoUDzxEwKZsm3odkMNEHWVV7IZg&e= |
From: Mooers, B. H.M. (HSC) <Bla...@ou...> - 2022-01-10 15:56:04
|
Hi Enrico, You do not need the first line of your script. This one-liner worked for me in the terminal. pymol -c -d "cmd.fetch('3nd3');cmd.show('surface');cmd.set('transparency','0.5');cmd.save('surf.pse');cmd.png('surf.png')" You might test reversing the order of the cmd.png() and cmd.save() commands. Best regards, Blaine Blaine Mooers, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine Director of the Laboratory of Biomolecular Structure and Function Academic Director, Biomolecular Structure Core, COBRE in Structural Biology Full Member, Cancer Biology Program, Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Mailing Address: 975 NE 10th Street, BRC 466 Oklahoma City, OK 73104-5419 Office: 405-271-8300 Lab: 405-271-8312 Websites: Faculty page: https://basicsciences.ouhsc.edu/bmb/Faculty/bio_details/mooers-blaine-hm-phd BSC-OKC (LBSF): https://research.ouhsc.edu/Core-Facilities/Laboratory-of-Biomolecular-Structure-and-Function COBRE in Structural Biology: https://www.ou.edu/structuralbiology ________________________________________ From: Ali Saad Kusay via PyMOL-users [pym...@li...] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 8:48 AM To: Enrico Martinez Cc: pymol-users Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PyMOL] surface representation of the protein-ligand interactions Hi Enrico, This is beyond my understanding, try and run this bash script without making the surface transparent (to figure out if the issue comes from the transparency) Also try the rebuild command before saving the image: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pymolwiki.org_index.php_Rebuild&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=QM8ZtM6vxjrnYB0Cs6BSV-M8WweuPuuTS1xLMGYQdKU&e= Cheers, Ali Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 On 10/1/22, 11:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: Thank you very much,Ali! just one question: when I do the surface calculations using bash script operating with the command lines of the pymol it produces correctly pse session with the surfaces. BUT if I save an image using png, the surface is totally absent. Here are my commands directly from the shell script: $pymol -c -d " from pymol import cmd cmd.load('${results}/${output}_${lig_name}_${receptor}_rep${i}.pdb') cmd.show( 'surface', '${output}* and polymer within 15 of ${output}* and not polymer' ) cmd.set( 'transparency', '0.5' ) cmd.save('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.pse') cmd.png('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.png',width=${image},height=${image},dpi=50,ray=0) " As the result of this workflow, the surface is present in the PSE file but not in the png image. Otherwise when I save png directly from the pymol's GUI the surface is well captured on the png as well. What should I include in my script ? пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 12:18, Ali Saad Kusay <aku...@un...>: > > Hi Enrico, > > You can carve the protein surface around the ligand, i.e. show only the surface behind the ligand, see this guide: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_1Of6CNLJyQU0W9yVofmRSV0-3Fdomain-3Dpymol.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=eU60ct3XrRn6e7JdG6JrHLyikGkuUbzJY35JQFXvTv8&e= > > You can also try and made the surface more transparent, but this doesn't always give the best results, see: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_vdsUCOMKzVTp8wQ53fvOudq-3Fdomain-3Dpymolwiki.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=pOFWGOP750OszaW7BCL8qGLr_VvBCCumHmvodMSYBeo&e= , i.e.: > > set transparency, 0.5 > > It would help to see an image of what you are working with atm > > Cheers, > > Ali > > Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist > The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health > 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 > > > On 10/1/22, 10:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: > > Dear Pymol users! > Working on the vizualisation of the protein-ligand interactions I > would like to switch from cartoon to the surface representation of the > protein, while still being capable to see the ligand-binding cavity > (as well as non-covalent interactions) > > Could you suggest me some combination of the options which could helps > me with such vizualisaiton? > I have alread tried > show surface, all within 5 of my_pdb and not polymer > set surface_smooth_edges, onset surface_smooth_edges, on > where my_pdb and not polymer corresponds to the selection of the ligand > > Eventualy this create cool surface representation of the protein and > but completely hides the ligand-binding cavity > Many thanks in advance! > Enrico > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_5uDYCP7LAXfKwZVvQF1Df45-3Fdomain-3Dmail-2Darchive.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=f6UjxY4QYDP77HQZ2CqSwjcwA_HDNuyv4cn6nskHIq0&e= > Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__protect-2Dau.mimecast.com_s_Q3GJCQnMBZfkQ9ZB7FkIfVr-3Fdomain-3Dsourceforge.net&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=lxdjMlSEnLEry730CbGSXWOU9HvpC8iBFjlmcWohToU&e= > > _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_pymol-2Dusers-40lists.sourceforge.net&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=jECdW3kdL8QeZ4l5PxiMhbpjSJBrXPLt0KPxa2kpcwI&e= Unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sourceforge.net_projects_pymol_lists_pymol-2Dusers_unsubscribe&d=DwIGaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=rxarJ7aLyHGI62pje1gd6hPxYn9Xv-2lWNWh_1Owonw&m=LJPkRnhTZf8Utg8JOTi736pL_UGe7aSsJfSdAISU1O6habH3BmWqqUuvTrUfXWMh&s=LFkputyTYxDqA2BAGoUDzxEwKZsm3odkMNEHWVV7IZg&e= |
From: Ali S. K. <aku...@un...> - 2022-01-10 14:48:34
|
Hi Enrico, This is beyond my understanding, try and run this bash script without making the surface transparent (to figure out if the issue comes from the transparency) Also try the rebuild command before saving the image: https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Rebuild Cheers, Ali Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 On 10/1/22, 11:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: Thank you very much,Ali! just one question: when I do the surface calculations using bash script operating with the command lines of the pymol it produces correctly pse session with the surfaces. BUT if I save an image using png, the surface is totally absent. Here are my commands directly from the shell script: $pymol -c -d " from pymol import cmd cmd.load('${results}/${output}_${lig_name}_${receptor}_rep${i}.pdb') cmd.show( 'surface', '${output}* and polymer within 15 of ${output}* and not polymer' ) cmd.set( 'transparency', '0.5' ) cmd.save('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.pse') cmd.png('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.png',width=${image},height=${image},dpi=50,ray=0) " As the result of this workflow, the surface is present in the PSE file but not in the png image. Otherwise when I save png directly from the pymol's GUI the surface is well captured on the png as well. What should I include in my script ? пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 12:18, Ali Saad Kusay <aku...@un...>: > > Hi Enrico, > > You can carve the protein surface around the ligand, i.e. show only the surface behind the ligand, see this guide: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/1Of6CNLJyQU0W9yVofmRSV0?domain=pymol.org > > You can also try and made the surface more transparent, but this doesn't always give the best results, see: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/vdsUCOMKzVTp8wQ53fvOudq?domain=pymolwiki.org, i.e.: > > set transparency, 0.5 > > It would help to see an image of what you are working with atm > > Cheers, > > Ali > > Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist > The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health > 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 > > > On 10/1/22, 10:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: > > Dear Pymol users! > Working on the vizualisation of the protein-ligand interactions I > would like to switch from cartoon to the surface representation of the > protein, while still being capable to see the ligand-binding cavity > (as well as non-covalent interactions) > > Could you suggest me some combination of the options which could helps > me with such vizualisaiton? > I have alread tried > show surface, all within 5 of my_pdb and not polymer > set surface_smooth_edges, onset surface_smooth_edges, on > where my_pdb and not polymer corresponds to the selection of the ligand > > Eventualy this create cool surface representation of the protein and > but completely hides the ligand-binding cavity > Many thanks in advance! > Enrico > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/5uDYCP7LAXfKwZVvQF1Df45?domain=mail-archive.com > Unsubscribe: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/Q3GJCQnMBZfkQ9ZB7FkIfVr?domain=sourceforge.net > > |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-10 12:10:44
|
Thank you very much,Ali! just one question: when I do the surface calculations using bash script operating with the command lines of the pymol it produces correctly pse session with the surfaces. BUT if I save an image using png, the surface is totally absent. Here are my commands directly from the shell script: $pymol -c -d " from pymol import cmd cmd.load('${results}/${output}_${lig_name}_${receptor}_rep${i}.pdb') cmd.show( 'surface', '${output}* and polymer within 15 of ${output}* and not polymer' ) cmd.set( 'transparency', '0.5' ) cmd.save('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.pse') cmd.png('${vizu}/${output}_${lig_name}_rep${i}.png',width=${image},height=${image},dpi=50,ray=0) " As the result of this workflow, the surface is present in the PSE file but not in the png image. Otherwise when I save png directly from the pymol's GUI the surface is well captured on the png as well. What should I include in my script ? пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 12:18, Ali Saad Kusay <aku...@un...>: > > Hi Enrico, > > You can carve the protein surface around the ligand, i.e. show only the surface behind the ligand, see this guide: https://pymol.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=figure:carving_surfaces > > You can also try and made the surface more transparent, but this doesn't always give the best results, see: https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Transparency, i.e.: > > set transparency, 0.5 > > It would help to see an image of what you are working with atm > > Cheers, > > Ali > > Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist > The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health > 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 > > > On 10/1/22, 10:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: > > Dear Pymol users! > Working on the vizualisation of the protein-ligand interactions I > would like to switch from cartoon to the surface representation of the > protein, while still being capable to see the ligand-binding cavity > (as well as non-covalent interactions) > > Could you suggest me some combination of the options which could helps > me with such vizualisaiton? > I have alread tried > show surface, all within 5 of my_pdb and not polymer > set surface_smooth_edges, onset surface_smooth_edges, on > where my_pdb and not polymer corresponds to the selection of the ligand > > Eventualy this create cool surface representation of the protein and > but completely hides the ligand-binding cavity > Many thanks in advance! > Enrico > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/cnxDCMwGxOtqr9lJjhwM0N6?domain=mail-archive.com > Unsubscribe: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/ZXpPCNLJyQU0W9R6oh42rcB?domain=sourceforge.net > > |
From: Ali S. K. <aku...@un...> - 2022-01-10 11:34:15
|
Hi Enrico, You can carve the protein surface around the ligand, i.e. show only the surface behind the ligand, see this guide: https://pymol.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=figure:carving_surfaces You can also try and made the surface more transparent, but this doesn't always give the best results, see: https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Transparency, i.e.: set transparency, 0.5 It would help to see an image of what you are working with atm Cheers, Ali Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health 424, Brain and Mind Centre | The University of Sydney | NSW 2050 On 10/1/22, 10:10 pm, "Enrico Martinez" <jms...@gm...> wrote: Dear Pymol users! Working on the vizualisation of the protein-ligand interactions I would like to switch from cartoon to the surface representation of the protein, while still being capable to see the ligand-binding cavity (as well as non-covalent interactions) Could you suggest me some combination of the options which could helps me with such vizualisaiton? I have alread tried show surface, all within 5 of my_pdb and not polymer set surface_smooth_edges, onset surface_smooth_edges, on where my_pdb and not polymer corresponds to the selection of the ligand Eventualy this create cool surface representation of the protein and but completely hides the ligand-binding cavity Many thanks in advance! Enrico _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list Archives: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/cnxDCMwGxOtqr9lJjhwM0N6?domain=mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/ZXpPCNLJyQU0W9R6oh42rcB?domain=sourceforge.net |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-10 11:04:46
|
Dear Pymol users! Working on the vizualisation of the protein-ligand interactions I would like to switch from cartoon to the surface representation of the protein, while still being capable to see the ligand-binding cavity (as well as non-covalent interactions) Could you suggest me some combination of the options which could helps me with such vizualisaiton? I have alread tried show surface, all within 5 of my_pdb and not polymer set surface_smooth_edges, onset surface_smooth_edges, on where my_pdb and not polymer corresponds to the selection of the ligand Eventualy this create cool surface representation of the protein and but completely hides the ligand-binding cavity Many thanks in advance! Enrico |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-10 08:43:34
|
try this man! awk 'NR==FNR {s = s $0 ORS; next} $0 == "ENDMDL" {$0 = s $0} 1' ./receptor.pdb ./docking.pdb >> together.pdb пт, 7 янв. 2022 г. в 18:10, Saurabh Gayali <sau...@gm...>: > I guess we need to split the docking poses first and then merge them > together. > Hope I come up with a python script or anyone else does. > > On Fri, 7 Jan, 2022, 18:47 Enrico Martinez, <jms...@gm...> > wrote: > >> In the case of >> cmd.save("together.pdb", "all", "0", "pdb") >> it saves everything in one pdb when the protein is present only in the >> first model, while I need to obtain its representation in all models >> Cheers >> E. >> >> пт, 7 янв. 2022 г. в 13:14, Saurabh Gayali <sau...@gm...>: >> >>> Have you tried the save command after opening both files? >>> https://pymol.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=command:save >>> Though not sure how the different poses will merge. >>> Also looking for a solution for a similar problem. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *Saurabh Gayali* / Post Doctoral Fellow >>> sau...@gm... / +91 8800412916 >>> >>> *CSIR-IGIB* >>> <http://example.com/>New Delhi, India >>> >>> >>> [image: Mailtrack] >>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> Sender >>> notified by >>> Mailtrack >>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> 07/01/22, >>> 05:43:49 pm >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:43 PM Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Autodock Users! >>>> I am dealing with the structural analysis of the protein-ligand >>>> interactions observed in the protein-ligand docking using VINA. >>>> Basically operating with the outputs I have two different pdb files: >>>> 1) for docking receptor (1 protein model) as well as for 2) docking >>>> sollutions (100 solutions). So I use pymol to open the both filles and >>>> visualize them >>>> >>>> pymol sollutions.pdb receptor.pdb >>>> >>>> May you suggest me some pymol command to merge the both in the pymol >>>> to. create multi-model PDB consisted of the both receptor and ligand >>>> poses in order then I could perform some structural analysis of this >>>> combined complex? >>>> Many thanks in advance >>>> Enrico >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PyMOL-users mailing list >>>> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe >>>> >>> |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-07 13:17:59
|
In the case of cmd.save("together.pdb", "all", "0", "pdb") it saves everything in one pdb when the protein is present only in the first model, while I need to obtain its representation in all models Cheers E. пт, 7 янв. 2022 г. в 13:14, Saurabh Gayali <sau...@gm...>: > Have you tried the save command after opening both files? > https://pymol.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=command:save > Though not sure how the different poses will merge. > Also looking for a solution for a similar problem. > > ------------------------------ > > *Saurabh Gayali* / Post Doctoral Fellow > sau...@gm... / +91 8800412916 > > *CSIR-IGIB* > <http://example.com/>New Delhi, India > > > [image: Mailtrack] > <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> Sender > notified by > Mailtrack > <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> 07/01/22, > 05:43:49 pm > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:43 PM Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Dear Autodock Users! >> I am dealing with the structural analysis of the protein-ligand >> interactions observed in the protein-ligand docking using VINA. >> Basically operating with the outputs I have two different pdb files: >> 1) for docking receptor (1 protein model) as well as for 2) docking >> sollutions (100 solutions). So I use pymol to open the both filles and >> visualize them >> >> pymol sollutions.pdb receptor.pdb >> >> May you suggest me some pymol command to merge the both in the pymol >> to. create multi-model PDB consisted of the both receptor and ligand >> poses in order then I could perform some structural analysis of this >> combined complex? >> Many thanks in advance >> Enrico >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PyMOL-users mailing list >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... >> Unsubscribe: >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe >> > |
From: Saurabh G. <sau...@gm...> - 2022-01-07 12:15:08
|
Have you tried the save command after opening both files? https://pymol.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=command:save Though not sure how the different poses will merge. Also looking for a solution for a similar problem. ------------------------------ *Saurabh Gayali* / Post Doctoral Fellow sau...@gm... / +91 8800412916 *CSIR-IGIB* <http://example.com/>New Delhi, India [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> 07/01/22, 05:43:49 pm On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:43 PM Enrico Martinez <jms...@gm...> wrote: > Dear Autodock Users! > I am dealing with the structural analysis of the protein-ligand > interactions observed in the protein-ligand docking using VINA. > Basically operating with the outputs I have two different pdb files: > 1) for docking receptor (1 protein model) as well as for 2) docking > sollutions (100 solutions). So I use pymol to open the both filles and > visualize them > > pymol sollutions.pdb receptor.pdb > > May you suggest me some pymol command to merge the both in the pymol > to. create multi-model PDB consisted of the both receptor and ligand > poses in order then I could perform some structural analysis of this > combined complex? > Many thanks in advance > Enrico > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe > |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2022-01-07 10:11:56
|
Dear Autodock Users! I am dealing with the structural analysis of the protein-ligand interactions observed in the protein-ligand docking using VINA. Basically operating with the outputs I have two different pdb files: 1) for docking receptor (1 protein model) as well as for 2) docking sollutions (100 solutions). So I use pymol to open the both filles and visualize them pymol sollutions.pdb receptor.pdb May you suggest me some pymol command to merge the both in the pymol to. create multi-model PDB consisted of the both receptor and ligand poses in order then I could perform some structural analysis of this combined complex? Many thanks in advance Enrico |
From: arooma m. <aro...@gm...> - 2022-01-06 16:54:47
|
Could you please post it on my behalf Hi Everyone I have few basic questions, i would really appreciate if any one could answer In interfaceResidue script, def interfaceResidues(cmpx, cA='c. A', cB='c. B', cutoff=1.0, selName="interface"): dASA cutoff is *1.0*. *How to decide this cutoff value? In a few examples I have noticed it is 0.75 and 2.5. * *I wonder if residues of the two chains (A and B) should be at a certain distance from each other like 6 or 8 Angstroms? I think I am confusing dASA with distance between atoms of the residues.* my second question is *Is it possible to get the values dASA of the complex and individual chains (calculated through the script below) printed into any txt or excel sheet? * # get the area of the complete complex cmd.get_area(tempC, load_b=1) # copy the areas from the loaded b to the q, field. cmd.alter(tempC, 'q=b') # extract the two chains and calc. the new area # note: the q fields are copied to the new objects # chA and chB cmd.extract(chA, tempC + " and (" + cA + ")") cmd.extract(chB, tempC + " and (" + cB + ")") cmd.get_area(chA, load_b=1) cmd.get_area(chB, load_b=1) My third question is in PyMol GUI, by using Action--preset--protein interface, are we executing the same ResidueInterface script . If yes, then why is there a difference in results? If No, what is the difference in both these functions I would really appreciate if you please answer these questions Thank you |
From: Oganesyan, V. <vah...@as...> - 2022-01-05 16:59:25
|
Hello PyMOLers, Happy New Year! Is there a way to show one of the molecules on image in a foggy state irrespective of depth-cue? I want to make an illustration showing how one molecule blocks another for interaction with ligand/receptor. Thanks in advance. Vaheh Oganesyan, Ph.D. [cid:image001.png@01D80228.40A93CD0] R&D | Biologics Engineering One Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878 T: 301-398-5851 Vah...@as...<mailto:Oga...@me...> |
From: Saurabh G. <sau...@gm...> - 2022-01-04 11:09:08
|
Have you tried the "DSS" command? https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Dss ------------------------------ *Saurabh Gayali* / Post Doctoral Fellow sau...@gm... / +91 8800412916 *CSIR-IGIB* <http://example.com/>New Delhi, India [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> 04/01/22, 04:38:43 pm On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:38 PM Bonsor, Daniel (NIH/NCI) [C] via PyMOL-users <pym...@li...> wrote: > Dear All, > > > > My latest structure has several 3-10 helices present, however, a few of > them in cartoon form shows the starting residue of the helix to be > distorted/twisted. > > > > The structure is 2.2Ang and I can clearly see the position of the amide > bond and the direction of carbonyl, but I cannot stop the twisting of the > cartoon. > > > > I have tried altering that residue ss to a loop which “works” (as in the > problem goes away) but I really wish to show the full helix. I have also > run DSSPtoPDB and force it not to recognize the 3-10 helices as helices but > in cartoon form you can see they are helices. > > > > Do anyone have suggestions or a way to force it to be a helix? > > [image: A close up of a toy Description automatically generated with low > confidence] > > Thanks, > > > > Daniel > > > > > > [image: Text Frederick National Laboratory on a teal background] > > > > [image: LinkedIn icon] > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/frederick-national-laboratory-for-cancer-research/> > [image: Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/FredNatLab> [image: Facebook > icon] <https://www.facebook.com/FredNatLab> [image: Instagram icon] > <https://www.instagram.com/frednatlab/> > > *Daniel A Bonsor PhD | Scientist I* > > RAS Structural Biology > > > > > > [image: Phone icon] > > office: 301-846-5134 / cell: 443-983-2930 > > > > [image: Email icon] > > dan...@ni... *[Contractor]* > > > > [image: Location icon] > > Post Office Box B, Frederick, MD 21702 > > > > [image: Link icon] > > frederick.cancer.gov > > > > > > The Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research is operated by > Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. for the National Cancer Institute. > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
From: Saurabh G. <sau...@gm...> - 2022-01-04 11:01:52
|
I hope the "show spheres" command represents the ligands better for you. ------------------------------ *Saurabh Gayali* / Post Doctoral Fellow sau...@gm... / +91 8800412916 *CSIR-IGIB* <http://example.com/>New Delhi, India [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> 04/01/22, 04:31:07 pm On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:59 PM EDUARDO JOSÉ AZEVEDO CORREA < ed...@ep...> wrote: > Dear friends > how are you? I hope you are doing well > I am using autodock vina for virtual screening.. I used the LigPret to > prepare my ligands into mol2 file, however when MGLTools convert the mol2 > to PDBQT and specially the vina output file in PDBQT has become a very > anomalous and strange molecule structure. > This file attached is ZINC100199761 molecule structure in mol2 generated > from SMILE sequence using LigPrep. After LigPrep I pass it > through the Avogadro to obtain the best geometry optimization > Only after that I make the PDBQT conversion using the MGLTools and so the > molecular docking using vina. > > Well did you know what is happening?? Is it a pymol visualization problem > with pdqbt files? > Could Anyone could know what the problem is and how to fix it? > Thanks a lot!! > > have a nice end year > > Kinds Regards > > Eduardo Jose Azevedo Correa > from Brazil > -- > > *Eduardo José Azevedo Corrêa* > > Biólogo| Professor e Pesquisador > > > (37)9997-5771 > > (37)3271-4673 > > *www.epamig.br <http://www.epamig.br/>* > > *EPAMIG Pitangui* > Rodovia BR - MG352 Km35 Zona Rural > > Caixa Postal 43 > > CEP 35650-000 - Pitangui - MG > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
From: Ali S. K. <aku...@un...> - 2022-01-04 10:56:44
|
Hi George, You can do pairwise alignments, i.e. align 3 of the structures to one structure. You can also use the "extra_fit" method (https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Extra_fit), i.e: extra_fit name CA, "object", super Replace object with the structure you want the other 3 to align to, this uses the "super" alignment method but you can also use "align", "cealign", "fit", etc. Depending on what gives the best results. Just a note, this will align all PyMOL objects to your selected object, you can make sub selections as needed. Cheers, Ali Ali Kusay | BPharm (Hons) | PhD Candidate & Pharmacist The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy | Faculty of Medicine and Health On 4/1/22, 8:52 pm, "George Tzotzos via PyMOL-users" <pym...@li...> wrote: I’m dealing with 4 heterogeneous structures belonging to the same fold. I’d like to compare some conserved structural features and for this purpose it would be useful that the structures are aligned and then visualised in a grid. I understand that the align command works for 2 structures only. Is there another way achieve what I described above. Looking forward to any suggestions Many thanks in advance and all the best for 2022 _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list Archives: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/gt9KCVARKgCx661v8UGCdCY?domain=mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/W231CWLVXkU5KKvk8TxrS7w?domain=sourceforge.net |
From: Saurabh G. <sau...@gm...> - 2022-01-04 10:51:52
|
extra_fit command will work in this scenario. More information in documentation here: https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Extra_fit ------------------------------ *Saurabh Gayali* / Post Doctoral Fellow sau...@gm... / +91 8800412916 *CSIR-IGIB* <http://example.com/>New Delhi, India [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&> 04/01/22, 04:18:41 pm On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:18 PM George Tzotzos via PyMOL-users < pym...@li...> wrote: > I’m dealing with 4 heterogeneous structures belonging to the same fold. > I’d like to compare some conserved structural features and for this purpose > it would be useful that the structures are aligned and then visualised in a > grid. > > I understand that the align command works for 2 structures only. Is there > another way achieve what I described above. > > Looking forward to any suggestions > > Many thanks in advance and all the best for 2022 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
From: George T. <gtz...@me...> - 2022-01-04 09:47:50
|
I’m dealing with 4 heterogeneous structures belonging to the same fold. I’d like to compare some conserved structural features and for this purpose it would be useful that the structures are aligned and then visualised in a grid. I understand that the align command works for 2 structures only. Is there another way achieve what I described above. Looking forward to any suggestions Many thanks in advance and all the best for 2022 |
From: Enrico M. <jms...@gm...> - 2021-12-22 13:36:29
|
Dear Pymol users! I am performing analysis of protein-ligand interactions for the ligand pose established in protein-docking and comparing it with the pattern observed in the X-ray structure for the same complex. Is it possible to use some Pymol command in the pymol's command line to save (in the text log) all of the non-bonded interactions established between ligand and all of the surrounded groups of the receptor for two different selections: (1) between the conformation used for docking and the best docking pose (2) between the X-ray structure + it's (native) ligand pose assuming that ((1): two different objects for receptor.pdb and the ensemble of docking conformations) and ((2): one object consisting of ligand and receptor together) are loaded in Pymol. Many thanks in advance! Cheers Enrico |
From: Max L. <ma...@ya...> - 2021-12-22 12:24:17
|
Hi, I installed pymol on Ubuntu 20.04 on WSL (Windows 10) using: sudo apt-get install -y pymol However, when I run pymol on the command line, I get this error: <string>:1: DeprecationWarning: the imp module is deprecated in favour of importlib; see the module's documentation for alternative uses qt.qpa.xcb: could not connect to display qt.qpa.plugin: Could not load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in "" even though it was found. This application failed to start because no Qt platform plugin could be initialized. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem. Available platform plugins are: eglfs, linuxfb, minimal, minimalegl, offscreen, vnc, xcb. Aborted What should I do to get pymol to work? Best regards, Max |
From: Bonsor, D. (NIH/N. [C] <dan...@ni...> - 2021-12-16 18:07:01
|
Dear All, My latest structure has several 3-10 helices present, however, a few of them in cartoon form shows the starting residue of the helix to be distorted/twisted. The structure is 2.2Ang and I can clearly see the position of the amide bond and the direction of carbonyl, but I cannot stop the twisting of the cartoon. I have tried altering that residue ss to a loop which “works” (as in the problem goes away) but I really wish to show the full helix. I have also run DSSPtoPDB and force it not to recognize the 3-10 helices as helices but in cartoon form you can see they are helices. Do anyone have suggestions or a way to force it to be a helix? [A close up of a toy Description automatically generated with low confidence] Thanks, Daniel [Text Frederick National Laboratory on a teal background] [LinkedIn icon]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/frederick-national-laboratory-for-cancer-research/> [Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/FredNatLab> [Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/FredNatLab> [Instagram icon] <https://www.instagram.com/frednatlab/> Daniel A Bonsor PhD | Scientist I RAS Structural Biology [Phone icon] office: 301-846-5134 / cell: 443-983-2930 [Email icon] dan...@ni...<mailto:dan...@ni...> [Contractor] [Location icon] Post Office Box B, Frederick, MD 21702 [Link icon] frederick.cancer.gov<https://frederick.cancer.gov/> The Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research is operated by Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. for the National Cancer Institute. -- |
From: Mirna D. <mir...@uc...> - 2021-12-16 02:57:22
|
Hello, Can I please unsubscribe from the mail lists? Best, Mirna From: Ambbar Aballay González <amb...@gm...> Sent: December 15, 2021 12:06 PM To: Thomas Holder <th...@th...> Cc: he...@sc...; pymol-users <pym...@li...> Subject: Re: [PyMOL] Can i find a specific sequence in pymol? [△EXTERNAL] Thank you very much. Ambbar El mié, 15 dic 2021 a las 16:02, Thomas Holder (<th...@th...<mailto:th...@th...>>) escribió: Hi Ambbar, To select sequence "ACDEF", you can do: select mysele, pepseq ACDEF See also https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Selection_Algebra Cheers, Thomas On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:54 PM Ambbar Aballay González <amb...@gm...<mailto:amb...@gm...>> wrote: > > Dear friends, > How can I find and select a specific sequence in pymol, while displaying the PDB? > > have a nice day > > Kinds Regards > > Ambbar Aballay González > Universidad de Concepción, Chile. > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |
From: Thomas H. <th...@th...> - 2021-12-15 19:55:24
|
Hi Ambbar, To select sequence "ACDEF", you can do: select mysele, pepseq ACDEF See also https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Selection_Algebra Cheers, Thomas On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:54 PM Ambbar Aballay González <amb...@gm...> wrote: > > Dear friends, > How can I find and select a specific sequence in pymol, while displaying the PDB? > > have a nice day > > Kinds Regards > > Ambbar Aballay González > Universidad de Concepción, Chile. > > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe |