From: Dirk K. <dir...@ps...> - 2003-02-27 14:18:21
|
Dear pymol users, in your experience, how does the graphical performance of pymol (or any o= ther=20 graphical program) on a PC running under Linux with a good stereo-capable= =20 graphics card (Nvidia Quadro, ATI FireGL) compare to a stereo-capable SGI= =20 workstation (O2, Octane, Fuel, Onyx)? I've got an old Pentium III PC with= 450=20 MHz and a (non-stereo) Nvidia GeForce2 MX440 graphics card side-by-side w= ith=20 an SGI O2 with a R12000 processor: a simple pymol (0.86) movie of a prote= in=20 sketch at 800x800 resolution and maximum display quality requires on the = SGI=20 3 minutes for 180 frames, i.e. 1 frame/sec, whereas the same movie requir= es=20 on the PC 20 seconds, i.e. 9 frames/sec. I wonder how this can be and wou= ld=20 like to hear about your experiences.=20 I've compiled pymol from the source file with the mips pro compiler from = SGI.=20 Results were comparable with the previous pymol version for which I've=20 installed directly the binaries. Thus, I don't think that the speed=20 difference is due to a compiler problem on the SGI. I've got another grap= hics=20 program for protein modelling, Moloc, that runs on both platforms. There,= =20 I've observed similar subjective speed differences in favour to the PC. B= ut I=20 couldn't measure any benchmarks. Best regards, Dirk Kostrewa. --=20 **************************************** Dirk Kostrewa Paul Scherrer Institut Life Sciences, OSRA/007 CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland E-mail: dir...@ps... Phone: +41-56-310-4722 Fax: +41-56-310-4556 WWW: http://www.sb.psi.ch **************************************** |