From: Thomas H. <tho...@sc...> - 2019-12-16 16:52:52
|
OK thanks. I haven't seen such performance differences before and couldn't reproduce it so far. Could you share your script (and data files if possible) with me? Thanks, Thomas > On Dec 16, 2019, at 5:42 PM, Lorenzo Gaifas <br...@gm...> wrote: > > Yes, it does. Both cases are with the GUI and ewual graphical representation. > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019, 17:37 Thomas Holder <tho...@sc...> wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > When you say "run from a python script", is that with the graphical GUI? That "instant update", does that include instant update of visual representations? > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > > On Dec 13, 2019, at 12:55 PM, Lorenzo Gaifas <br...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Dear Pymol users, > > > > I just discovered something I did not expect: the same python function can have extremely different performance when called as a python function or using the pymol api. > > > > To be more specific: I have a function func that (among other things) uses cmd.alter several times over a big system to change the properties and representation. > > > > If I run it calling func() from a python script, its effects are almost instant. If I call it with cmd.do('func') (or directly from within pymol with func), it’s extremely slow (up to 10 seconds) and Pymol freezes completely during this time. > > > > I expected this to be due to an overhead of the api itself, but when I do the same thing with a simpler function, I see no noticeable difference. > > > > Why exactly is this happening? And more importantly, how can I get the performance of func even when I call it from within pymol? > > > > Thank you, > > Lorenzo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PyMOL-users mailing list > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pym...@li... > > Unsubscribe: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe > > -- > Thomas Holder > PyMOL Principal Developer > Schrödinger, Inc. > -- Thomas Holder PyMOL Principal Developer Schrödinger, Inc. |