From: Roger R. <rro...@ma...> - 2008-06-11 17:35:46
|
Buz Barstow wrote: > Dear All, > > I'm considering purchasing a new graphics workstation for molecular > graphics and macromolecular refinement. I'm considering buying a > machine with 2 quad core xeon processors, and a nVidia Quadro FX > graphics card with 1.5 Gb of memory. > > Can the current generation of software, and maybe the next generation > of visualization software, make use of a system with so many > processors, or am I better off spending the money elsewhere? > > Thanks! and all the best, > > --Buz > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > PyMOL-users mailing list > PyM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users > Pymol will use all 4 cores of my Q9300 processor, but most XRD applications (CCP4, O, EPMR, etc.) will only use one core at a time currently. Of course, with more cores, you can run more jobs at once without significant penalty (depending on how memory- or disk-bound they are). I built my last Linux workstation around a very inexpensive DG35EC Intel motherboard and a value-oriented Intel Q9300 quad-core CPU, and attached a 9600GT graphics card (non-stereo-enabled) and a 24" LCD panel. For less than $1500 this configuration is pretty quick for routine crystallography tasks. You don't really need much in the way of hardware for XRD data processing. For image processing and movie-making in Pymol, for example, the extra cores really shine, though. Cheers, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roger S. Rowlett Professor Colgate University Presidential Scholar Department of Chemistry Colgate University 13 Oak Drive Hamilton, NY 13346 tel: (315)-228-7245 ofc: (315)-228-7395 fax: (315)-228-7935 email: rro...@ma... |