Re: [Pyme-help] Re-activating pyme maintenance
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
belyi
From: Martin A. <mar...@go...> - 2014-05-07 13:28:51
|
On Wednesday 07 May 2014 14:55:34 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 13:12:17 schrieb Martin Albrecht: > > :) To be honest, I'd just stick with bitbucket for the time being, > > Fine, I've updated http://wiki.gnupg.org/APIs accordingly. > > Do you want to continue this mailinglist? Might as well keep it around? Could bite us since we're not admins but for now I'd say: baby steps :) > > Okay, PyME it is. I'll merge my fixes branch into master and bump the > > version number, i.e. I shall do a new release. > > Yes, a new version like 1.0 or 0.9 would be cool! > Actually because I don't have an overview what is missing, > why not call it v1.0? I've no overview either. It's only bugfixes so far, hence I'd simply go for 0.8.2. But maybe 0.9 to indicate there's been some major social change? 1.0 is too ambitious in my view. > Best, > Bernhard Cheers, Martin |