Re: [Pyme-help] Re-activating pyme maintenance

[Martin A. <mar...@go...>]

On Tuesday 06 May 2014 16:48:00 Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > > Martin do you intent to at least maintain pyme a bit?
> > 
> > I'm using it, so I'll maintain it to some extend.
> 
> Very cool! Then it is your choice, I'm just trying to help you
> come to a good decision.

:) To be honest, I'd just stick with bitbucket for the time being, this way it 
fits most naturally into my workflow. If anyone has strong feelings about 
this, we can revisit and move at a later date.
 
> > I'd appreciate help/advise from more experienced members of the community
> > (most of my coding projects are fairly academic), though. For example, I
> > wouldn't actively pursue, say, Debian updating its repositories as I have
> > no experience with that. If someone would help with that, I'd appreciate
> > it.
> 
> I certainly is a good idea to communicate with the Debian package
> maintainers. You can write problem reports in their trackers or contact
> them right away. Everytime you believe something is interesting for them:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyme.html

I shall add this to my todo list.

> > Shall we rename it to PyME2 or something though?
> 
> As Igor is missing in action, I believe we should keep the name
> and just continue as the original. I mean, if he comes back, he is very
> welcome and we could still change the name. From my point of view, this is
> the legitimate continuation.

Okay, PyME it is. I'll merge my fixes branch into master and bump the version 
number, i.e. I shall do a new release.

Cheers,
Martin