Re: [Pyme-help] Re-activating pyme maintenance
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
belyi
From: Bernhard R. <ber...@in...> - 2014-05-06 14:48:10
|
Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2014 16:00:53 schrieb Martin Albrecht: > On Monday 05 May 2014 15:34:55 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > The manual (*) say we should fork now. > > Does it make sense to still do this on SF? > > > > I see two advantages of forking on SF. > > a) people will mor easily find the "continuation" > > b) SF uses Allura a Free Software hosting platform, were bitbucket is > > proprietary > > Drawbacks: > > c) effort > > d) advertisment on sf > > It should be easy to migrate from BitBucket to SF. TBH I don't mind either > way: GitHub, BitBucket, SourceForge. As SF is the service running a Free Software platform, that usually is may choice (with hg instead of git, but that is just my preferance). > Doing it on GitHub might encourage people to send pull requests and stuff, > so GitHub might have that going for itself. I don't know if BB vs. SF makes > a difference in that regard. I hope Allura will implement this sooner or later. > > Martin do you intent to at least maintain pyme a bit? > > I'm using it, so I'll maintain it to some extend. Very cool! Then it is your choice, I'm just trying to help you come to a good decision. > I'd appreciate help/advise from more experienced members of the community > (most of my coding projects are fairly academic), though. For example, I > wouldn't actively pursue, say, Debian updating its repositories as I have > no experience with that. If someone would help with that, I'd appreciate > it. I certainly is a good idea to communicate with the Debian package maintainers. You can write problem reports in their trackers or contact them right away. Everytime you believe something is interesting for them: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyme.html > Shall we rename it to PyME2 or something though? As Igor is missing in action, I believe we should keep the name and just continue as the original. I mean, if he comes back, he is very welcome and we could still change the name. From my point of view, this is the legitimate continuation. Best, Bernhard -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member) Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner |